New Search
Comments and Responses, September 26, 2000 Public Hearing in Eugene <br />T2.2--Comment acknowledged. <br />T2.3=Comment acknowledged. <br />T2.4-Comment acknowledged. <br />T2.5-Comment acknowledged. <br />Transcript 1 <br />e <br />T2.1 i I appreciate the duA dtliflence that you folks <br />Conti. 2 have pond through and your studies. I'm pleaaetl that the City <br />3 of Eugene continues to ba a possible cite or sites for your <br />4 use. <br />T2.2 6 I continue to tell you that the people of Eugene <br />6 that Communicate LO me, now this isn't a unanimous position, <br />~ but ovorwhelningly, they want the federal courthouse to be in <br />8 the Cfty of Eugene. That' want it horo. <br />72,$ 3 Mid I'm sure that there are people 1n your <br />ifl organization that might say Ara you sure that's what Choy <br />11 realty want? But this is the case. we have n city council <br />12 that is unanimously 1n aupportof iL. You havo a mayor that <br />13 1c in support of it. <br />T2.4 14 Mo have City staff Hers that are prepared to <br />16 work xith you to make the afW that you select a *rorkinD alts, <br />18 And frankly, I Lh1nk n center point Lo our city. City <br />1T councilor Nancy Nathancon x111 be making come comments to you <br />/8 later regarding visioning xe have for downtown Eugene end the <br />19 federal courthouse to en important Dart of that vision. <br />72.6 20 I'm available Lo answer any queationc. I want <br />21 Lo again thank you for the courtesies that you've shown us and <br />22 Your willinpnesa to stns xith ue. <br />23 we're not an eacY community to come to <br />24 COnsenaua. And when this CpmMUnltY does come to COneenauS. I <br />2b think you x111 be pleased if you soloct the cites, whichever <br />Final ElS <br />208 New Federal Courthouse <br />