F1NAL 2008-2011 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM <br />OREGON TRANSPORTATION <br />INVESTMENT ACTS <br />The Oregon Transportation Investment Acts <br />(OTIA I, II, III) are not programs but legis- <br />latively approved measures that augment ex- <br />isting program budgets, enabling a series of <br />projects to be constructed. The funds gener- <br />ated flow through existing state- <br />administered programs including moderni- <br />zation, pavement preservation, and bridge <br />replacement and rehabilitation. <br />Three separate funding packages have been <br />approved under the OTIA program. OTIA I <br />and OTIA II, the two transportation bills ap- <br />proved by the 2001 Oregon State Legisla- <br />ture, provided a total of $500 million in state <br />bonding proceeds to modernize and preserve <br />Oregon's transportation system. With local <br />matching funds of $146 million, the total <br />program amounts to a $646 million invest- <br />ment in the state's infrastructure. Of the <br />$500 million, the Modernization Program <br />received approximately $250 million, bridge <br />replacement and rehabilitation projects re- <br />ceived approximately $175 million, and <br />pavement preservation projects received ap- <br />proximately $75 million. <br />The 2003 Legislature passed OTIA III, <br />which provided an additional $1.3 billion to <br />replace and repair state bridges, $300 mil- <br />lion to replace and repair local bridges, and <br />$300 million for modernization statewide. <br />The OTIA I and II projects went to contract <br />prior to 2008, so they do not appear in the <br />project listings of this document. For more <br />information about OTIA, go online: <br />http://e~ov.ore~on• Gov/ODOT/HWY/OTIA/ <br />FEDERAL DISCRETIONARY <br />FUNDING <br />Federal discretionary funding is a process <br />for securing federal funding for specific <br />state and local projects. The term earmark <br />means that money is written into the federal <br />budget for one and only one purpose. Ear- <br />marks often involve large modernization <br />projects, but Oregon and other states have <br />secured earmarks for bridge and public tran- <br />sit projects as well. <br />Earmarks usually do not cover all of a pro- <br />ject's cost, and will require matching funds <br />along with additional funds to fully fund the <br />project. ODOT coordinates with the Oregon <br />Congressional Delegation on a set of ear- <br />mark priorities for which the state will <br />pledge its resources as matching funds, to be <br />submitted for consideration during the fed- <br />eral budget process. <br />PUBLIC INVOL VEMENT AND <br />GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT <br />There are federal regulations and state poli- <br />cies regarding STIP public involvement. The <br />federal regulations state that public in- <br />volvement must be proactive, must provide <br />opportunities for early and ongoing in- <br />volvement, and must continue throughout <br />the transportation planning and program- <br />ming process. The state must comply with <br />the requirements set out in Title VI of the <br />federal Civil Rights Act, and the Executive <br />Order pertaining to Environmental Justice. <br />They further stipulate that the state provide: <br />• A process for demonstrating explicit <br />consideration and response to public in- <br />put during the planning and program de- <br />velopment process; and <br />• A process for seeking out and consider- <br />ing the needs of those traditionally un- <br />derserved by existing transportation sys- <br />tems, such as low-income and minority <br />households, which may face challenges <br />accessing employment and other ameni- <br />ties. <br />Page 25 <br />