New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2010-2013 STIP Draft
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
2010-2013 STIP Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2009 11:13:52 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:22:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
ODOT
PW_Subject
STIP
Document_Date
10/1/2008
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DRAFT 20102013 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM <br />20Project Readiness for C-STIP Bridge Projects <br />Projects that can begin construction within the timeframe of the STIP are considered to be more <br />ready. The overall judgment of a project's readiness is dependent on timely completion of neces- <br />sary pre-construction steps and not on the number of steps to be completed. <br />a1Leverage and Public Benefit for C-STIP Bridge Projects <br />ACTs, MPOs and regional or statewide advisory groups should evaluate how proposed projects <br />leverage additional funding or collateral community benefits and make wise and efficient use of <br />infrastructure and natural resources. Examples of leverage and public benefits for C-STIP bridge <br />replacement/rehabilitation projects include: <br />• Other funding contributions, such as additional federal funds, local matching funds or <br />provision of project right-of--way, private funding. <br />• Bundling with other infrastructure projects (provided there is no adverse affect on project <br />readiness). <br />• Environmental enhancement, such as culvert replacement and improved drainage or fish <br />passage. <br />• Direct benefits to multiple modes of travel, advancement of modal choice and intermodal <br />activities. This would include local efforts to accommodate non-auto modal opportuni- <br />ties. <br />• Improvements in Oregon's economy by addressing transportation challenges including <br />improving service delivery. <br />Page 219 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.