New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
West Broadway Advisory Committee Final Report
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
West Broadway Advisory Committee Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 1:17:41 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:22:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Urban Renewal
Document_Date
9/19/2007
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br /> The participants favored the committee's recommended design Design Elements Average scores <br /> elements. Though some questioned the cost versus benefits of <br /> z.ao <br /> Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification, <br /> 1.65 - 1.63 <br /> people noted strong support for the principles of sustainability, The 1.53 ,.5, ,.5' <br /> 1.35 ,.41' <br /> recommendation for architectural history and local design provided ,.z2 <br /> the widest range of responses:. some declared that the City should ~,_OO _ _ - <br /> 0.81 <br /> not control architects' design choices or what buildings to .save 0J4 <br /> while others demanded the preservation of historic buildings. The <br /> committee's proposal for design review process elicited a mixed ~ <br /> response rangingfromthosewhoviewedexistingdesignguidel.mesas <br /> R, R2 R3 R4 RS R6 R7 ~ RS R9 R10 <br /> sufficient to others who felt the need to add design review to maintain Recommendation <br /> high standards:. The committee's business transition elements <br /> received substantial publicsupportthoughseveraltextchangeswere Workshop Two-This tablesummarizestheaverageresponseperrecommendation <br /> suggested to help clarify the intent of two recommendations. ~ (R 1, R2, etc...) for Design Elements <br /> i <br /> At both public input sessions, WBAC members were present and in <br /> many cases facilitated the table groups. Documentation from each <br /> workshop was compiled and distributed back to all committee <br /> members. The public comments. and input from the two workshops Business Transition Average scores <br /> were incorporated .into the discussion of subsequent meetings, z.oo - <br /> and helped to influence the final Core, Recommendations and the ,.63 <br /> Qualifications/Evaluations. 1.36 ' <br /> 1.31 <br /> 1.13 - 7.17 <br /> 1.00 - ~ <br /> Agendas, minutes, and supporting materials for each meeting are ~ ° <br /> available to the public on the West Broadway web. site, www.eugene- <br /> or.gov/westbroadway and in binders provided at the. Permit and <br /> Information Center at the Atrium (99 West 1 Oth Avenue). and at the <br /> 0.00 _ - -T T- <br /> .Reference Desk in the Eugene Publiclibrary. R, Rz R3 R4 R5 R6 ' <br /> Recommendation <br /> Workshop Two -This table summarizes the average response per recommendation - <br /> (R 1, R2, etc...) for Business Transition <br /> <br /> 20I F'iihlii_ IriF~~uP ~ 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.