New Search
The following Graph provides detail of the Treatment needs for the Improved System by <br />percentage excluding concrete. streets. <br />Percentage Current Needs By Functional Class 2006 Year End <br />1 <br />- ~ Major Art Minor Art Collector Neigh. Coll Lo -_ s <br />' <br /> ~ Slurry 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.7% _-t. -~~ ~ <br /> oRecons 1.3% 7.4% 3.0% 1.1% 2.1% ~ 14.9'0 <br /> ®Overay 1.1% 2.6% 2.0% 1.0% 16.2% 9~;' <br /> ®None 3.0% 8.8% 3.0% ,3.3% 17.4% „5A"5 <br /> <br />o Slurry <br />~ Recons <br />®Overlay <br />m None <br /> <br /> <br />Projected Pavement Preservation Estima~tl 1! u <br />(FY06-FYl l) <br />From the beginning ~e Pave eilt Preservation Program (PPP) an adequate funding source <br />has not been achie e ~arrently Mere are several Biding sources contributing to <br />rehabilitation and reconstruction pri~j~. The mu source is our local gas tax (5 cents per <br />gallon). A pc~-ti~l crf Eu~~~nc's ~a~ ta~-is scheduled to sunset in 2008,,therefore for the <br />purpose ~ t:his repo~i r~pcal of the ~un~ct, scheduled February 29, 2008, is assumed. <br />Transp~irtation System 1)cvclopmcnt C r>ges (SDC) generate an average of $840,000; this <br />fundiii~ scxce is expected Wt ' decrea ased on permit activity. As stated previously, funds <br />that Lane County committe om it~`share of state transportation funds ended in 2006. If <br />these assumption hold true, ds for PPP projects will remain around $4.2 million per year <br />after 2008, whic': imp ement over the $2.8 million reported last year. The following <br />.table describes they i yet ding sources for our PPP program for Fiscal Years 2006. <br />through 2011. <br />10 <br />