New Search
(admin.rule #6.645. <br />Please let me know if the orders that were already in progress in 2002 need to go through <br />the entire signature process again with a 2003 number. <br />Zara <br />x5241 <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: FIELAND Kate A <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:13 AM <br />To: CUNNINGHAM Cindy; PINES Zara A <br />Cc: FIELAND Kate A; AANDERUD Kris L <br />Subject: RE: Admin Orders <br />Hi: this is a project that I have been trying to get to, any admin order that has not <br />been signed in 2002 will now have to have an 03 number. <br />Please <br />check with CRO to get new numbers. <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Cindy CUNNINGHAM [mailto:Cindy.CUNNINGHAM~harrang.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:01 AM <br />To: zara.a.pines@ci.eugene.or.us <br />Cc: Kate.A.FIELAND~ci.eugene.or.us; kris.l.aanderudQci.eugene.or.us <br />Subject: Admin Orders <br />Hi Zara. I work with Joan Wise at the City Attorneys office and just wanted to check on <br />the status of Admin Order No. 58-02-30 (Designation of Charnelton Street between Broadway <br />and 11th Avenue, and 10th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Olive Street as Two-Way <br />Traffic Streets). I checked the City Recorder's log and it doesn't show that it has. been <br />signed yet. <br />Also, when the order was sent to Joan for review, she was given a number of 58-02-29, but <br />it is in the log as 58-02-30. We need to be sure that the Admin Order and exhibit have <br />the correct number on them. <br />Lastly, Joan asked that I check with you on the two admin orders that are in the CRO log <br />(58-02-31 and 58-02-32) re placement of traffic maintenance devices, and signing and <br />marking standards in Eugene. I don't believe that our office has received those and I am <br />checking to see if you want them reviewed. <br />Thanks! <br />2 <br />