New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2.20 Workplace Conduct
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
PW Human Resources
>
APWA Accreditation 2004
>
2.20 Workplace Conduct
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2010 2:47:37 PM
Creation date
1/8/2009 11:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Certification
PW_Subject
PWA Certficication
Document_Date
7/1/2004
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br /> 6) Supervisors count on crew leads to communicate for the crew? <br /> I~ 7) Supervisor may be interested in one part of the work, but not another (if have more <br /> than one crew)? <br /> 8) Supervisor may not have communication skills? <br /> 9) Supervisors are not the only ones responsible for communicating? <br /> Do Supervisors believe it would make a difference if they were more involved? Would <br /> j employees feel more appreciated? <br /> How would it work for Supervisors if, at the beginning of every project, the supervisor <br /> meets with the whole crew? It then becomes the whole crew's project, with employees <br /> providing input and having some control over the project. <br /> How would it work for Supervisors if crew leads, lead workers, and supervisors could <br /> meet a few minutes each day (or week supervisors should be involved in <br /> particular projects? MR~PS v~?..t~'--D t a~ 1Z°'T <br /> wn t.a~h <br /> m <br /> e.~' C,PYt~S <br /> ,~~1~ <br /> ar » u.~- <br /> W TO TEST THEOR~(for discussioa~decision at next meetin i ~ ~u.~~ <br /> Surve all supervisors r he yar pone survey, a-mail survey, hrc~opy SK' ' <br /> Y <br /> ? ~ 1 <br /> uestionnaire . Kee confidentiali ~ <br /> P tY <br /> 2) andomly select some supervisors from the yard to be in a focus group (ask <br /> u~a~~o questions, have a discussion). Any Committee members present? ~s~ <br /> ' ~ 3) Invite all supervisors to a facilitated discussion. <br /> ry 4) Invite randomly selected supervisors to a Committee meeting -letting Committee ~ ~ ,(1~, <br /> ~~,~AF. members ask questions. ~ ~ o- <br /> 5 sk supervisors to ask each other the questions -just supervisors in the room ~ <br /> with one of them recording the answers or reporting to the Committee. <br /> <br /> j 6) Other? ~°4~s,' <br /> <br /> j ~wl~r~ X~ <br /> ,~.1?Cs~ Thoroughly explain (in all cases) the issue the Committee is focusing on (lack of ~ <br /> ~ involvement) and the reason supervisors are being asked to respond (fact-finding <br /> ;~,~rg mission -it's not the people, it's the system). Proceed with questions. Record all <br /> questions, answers, and comments. <br /> ,~}f.~rl~it?4 Issues to consider: More honest answers if more confidential? If Committee members <br /> tiistt are there, will supervisors be intimidated? <br /> ~ ~ <br /> ~+P~'` <br /> 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.