New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
PAF3888
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Capital
>
2008
>
PAF3888
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2009 5:26:31 PM
Creation date
12/30/2008 3:00:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Capital
PW_Document_Type_Capital
Project Authorization
PW_Active
Yes
External_View
No
GJN
003888
GL_Project_Number
905066
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The 905066 capital number is for the "Amazon headwaters basin <br /> study". No good job number has been created for that capital <br /> project so at this point all I know is that it was a line item in the <br /> 2000 budget. Peggy will get back to me with further info on <br /> whether it was included in the 2001 budget. <br /> This project number is for the "upper amazon creek fconceptuall <br /> plan" -see attached page out of the 00-05 CIP for a description <br /> This was intended to be a precursor to the Corps project I had <br /> j lust forgotten that we budgeted for it. <br /> Our recent discussions of a "headwaters" study indicated there <br /> wasn't funding- for this and, what I am thinking of as a <br /> "headwater" study, doesn't sound as though it would be <br /> something funded out of the capital budget. What I am <br /> wondering is if the name "Amazon headwaters basin study" is in <br /> error, or if the original concept of the "headwaters" included <br /> areas upstream of 19th a"e., or if we actually do have funding for <br /> the headwater study and it is intended to be a capital project? <br /> This isn't a headwaters study. <br /> <br /> 1 <br /> The fund had $29,000 in it. The only charge to this fund to date <br /> is the $1,000 for the work Todd Moses did on the South Park <br /> PUD. This was charged to the 905066 fund but was not <br /> processed by Peggy, which it should have been if that was a <br /> I~ capital expenditure. <br /> f ~ This was probably the best place to take this from but Peggy's <br /> right - it should have been processed through her Maybe you <br /> could check with Lori/Cindy depending on who helped you <br /> process the Todd Moses contract at the time. <br /> I have completed as much of the Project Authorization Form as I <br /> can without knowing whether the work l am currently doing <br /> should be put under the 905066 fund and name. I am putting it <br /> on your chair in hopes it will at least give you what you wanted to <br /> have before you meeting with Les. <br /> As far as needing more money at this point it would mean <br /> supplemental budget and I'm not sure we want to qo there I'll <br /> get back to you on that one in the meantime though I'll initial the <br /> PA form and send it along to Les for initial. <br /> l <br /> _ _ <br /> _ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.