told by the NSP that the Survey and Mapping Data submittal has been accepted. <br /> Activity 6: Hydrologic Analyses and submittal. This task was yet another learning process for <br /> everyone following the newer guidelines. Submittal of analyses was sent to FEMA (NSP) in <br /> October 2004. <br /> Activity 7: Independent QA/QC Review of Hydrologic Analyses. Approval of the Hydrologic <br /> Anal sis was received v' <br /> y is email from Kevm Doyle of the Map Mod Team July 10, 2006. <br /> ' Obviously the tasks required of the NSP are out of our control for meeting timelines and realize '4: <br /> the partnership works both ways when understanding extended completions. <br /> Activity 8: Hydraulic Analyses. The Analysis was completed and submitted to the NSP in <br /> December 2005 for review. Delays in this task were mainly a result of changes in staff (PWR) <br /> and understandings of procedures and processes for metadata submittals and obtaining some <br /> y <br /> surve data. <br /> Activity 9: Independent QA/QC Review of Hydraulic Analyses. Kevin Doyle of the Map Mod <br /> . Team re lied with a review letter via email 11 2 <br /> p Jul 006. There were minor comments in , <br /> Y <br /> regards to the analysis. It was agreed that•the revised hydraulic model would be submitted along <br /> with the ma m and TSDN under activities 11 and 12.. <br /> pp~ g <br /> Activity 10: Floodplain Mapping. Floodplain Mapping was submitted to FEMA along with the t <br /> revised hydraulic model on November 8, 2006 for review. <br /> Activity 11: Independent QA/QC Review of Floodplain Mapping (Revised Areas), a <br /> responsibility of the NSP. On Apri19, 2007, PWR received correspondence from Mark Riebau <br /> that the submittal had been misplaced due the departure of an employee that was scheduled to <br /> review the submittal. . <br /> • Activity 12: Base Map Acquisition. The DFIltM and GIS data was sulirnitted for review <br /> . November 8, 2006 along with the mapping and revised hydraulic model. r; <br /> Activities 13 -16 are much reliant on the previous activities and the NSP work involved with <br /> each of these activities. A schedule for these activities can better be provided by the NSP after <br /> review of this document. <br /> Attached: Please find current financial status report and our.first request for Reimbursement <br /> under grant EMS-2004-GR-0035. <br /> r <br /> a <br /> IF: <br /> Sincerely, <br /> `Q~ [ <br /> <br /> ` Terry Colvin <br /> Project Manager <br /> a' <br /> 541-682-5398 <br /> 2 <br /> <br />