New Search
Task 2-5 Potential Obstacles <br /> Re~onsible Partner: The City of Eugene and PWR <br /> Scope: The Project Management Team shall identify potential obstacles in an effort to learn of any issues <br /> that could delay or prohibit the Flood Map Project. Some examples of potential obstacles to completing <br /> the project in a timely fashion are the following: inability to address mapping needs adequately with <br /> available funding; difficulty coordinating community funding with FEMA funding; lack of an available <br /> base map meeting FEMA minimum specifications (described in Appendix K of the "Guidelines and <br /> Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners"); hydrologic and/or hydraulic issues; community <br /> concerns; reliance on other studies or data (e.g., topographic mapping) that will not be available within <br /> the ro'ect's schedulin constraints• and other considerations FederaUState/non- overnmental <br /> P J g ~ ( g <br /> organizations, programmatic, disaster-related, legal). <br /> The Project Management Team shall explore potential issues on an ongoing basis. If potential obstacles <br /> are identified that could halt or significantly hinder the completion of the project, the Project Management <br /> Team shall evaluate all possible alternatives and develop an appropriate course of action as soon as <br /> practicable. Based on input from the Project Management Team, Pacific Water Resources will prepare a <br /> Potential Obstacles to Project. Completion checklist. This checklist is a "living" document that should be <br /> ~ updated as necessary throughout the lifecycle of the project. <br /> <br /> i <br /> Standards: All work under Activity 2 shall be performed in accordance with the standards specified in <br /> Section 5 of this MAS. A Potential Obstacle to Project Completion Checklist template is provided in <br /> Appendix I, Subsection I.1.7 of the "Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners". <br /> Deliverables: A Potential Obstacle to Project Completion Checklist in digital form. <br /> Task 2-6 Draft Scope of Work <br /> Responsible Partner: The City of Eugene and PWR (Completed) <br /> Scone: Based on the information collected up to this point, PWR will develop a Draft Scope of Project <br /> for ma in needs of the Cit of Eu ene. In ut received from the FEMA Regional Project Officer and <br /> pp g Y g P <br /> other involved community agencies will be used in the development of the Draft Scope of Project. The <br /> following items will be addressed in the Draft Scope of Project: review available Information; determine <br /> if and how effective FIS data can be used in new project; identify other data needed to complete the <br /> Project and its source; DFIRM format <br /> The Draft Scope of Project will establish priority levels for flooding sources to be analyzed and mapped, <br /> vents of flood <br /> and revise the estimate schedules and associated costs for completion of the compo <br /> mapping. <br /> Standards: All work under Activity 2 shall be performed in accordance with the standards specified in <br /> Section 5 of this MAS. <br /> Deliverables: A Draft Scope of Project document in digital form and an update of the Scoping Tool files <br /> to include the draft scope. <br /> Task 2-7 Draft Scope of Work Conference Call <br /> Mapping Activity Statement No. 1 6 <br /> City of Eugene,;OR <br /> _ <br /> _ <br /> <br />