New Search
11 1 1 1 <br /> ~ ~ 11 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 <br /> A endix C <br /> pp <br /> Brid a Fundin List <br /> 9 9 <br /> The Vision Committee recommends an additional investment of $10 million in <br /> the state highway Bridge Program. Bridge repairs and replacements are usually <br /> planned ahead of time, but can be affected by unforeseeable conditions. The <br /> material below illustrates how ODOT would make needed improvements to state <br /> highway bridges based on information from its bridge management system, local <br /> transportation plans, and input from local stakeholders and the Area Commissions <br /> on Transportation. <br /> A proposed additional annual amount of $10 million for the bridge <br /> program would enable the following to occur: <br /> Address bridge deck replacements while accomplishing other $3,000,000 <br /> work, such as combining deck work with Pavement Preservation <br /> projects when priority bridges are included in a Pavement <br /> Preservation project's limits. (500 average length X 40' average <br /> width at $150/SF = $3.0 million} <br /> Overlay bridge decks (about three per year) while accomplishing $6,000,000 <br /> other work. (500' average length X 40' average width at $100/ <br /> SF = $2.0 million per bridge} <br /> Address bridge deck replacements while accomplishing other $3,000,000 <br /> work, such as combining deck work with Pavement Preservation <br /> projects when priority bridges are included in a Pavement <br /> Preservation project's limits. (500 average length X 40' average <br /> width at $150/SF = $3.0 million} <br /> Address impact loading systematically, about 10 bridges. $250,000 <br /> ($25,000 average for mud jack/overlay impact panel) <br /> Address bridge deck cracking systematically, about 15 bridges. $750,000 <br /> ($50,000 per bridge average for deck seal) <br /> The enhanced fundin for the State users. Deterioration that users might <br /> g notice include a polished riding surface, <br /> Bridge Program would extend the life ruttin , of or an holes, s alls, and <br /> of existing bridge decks currently in g p p p <br /> <br /> "satisfactor " or "fair" condition b bumps at deck points. Of greater <br /> y y concern are safety issues associated <br /> sealing concrete cracks and addressing with decks such as loose rebar or <br /> settlement issues at impact panels; it armored corners and broken steel <br /> would likely have small effect on the rates. <br /> deck performance measure. g <br /> Brid e decks are the onl art of The number and mix of projects that <br /> g y p can be funded with $10 million can vary <br /> the bridge that vehicles should be in reatl based on the brill es selected <br /> contact with as they use the bridge. As g y g <br /> a result it is critical that brill e decks for work. For example, the deck <br /> ' g replacement for the Columbia River s <br /> are well maintained for the safety of gi s Ra ids Brid e of $14.6 million <br /> 99 p 9 <br /> 38 <br /> <br />