statistical significance and may not be tax applies to trucks with a gross weight over <br /> definitive. In the meantime, some simulated 26,000 pounds. Generally, the tax paid by a <br /> alternative scenarios will have to suffice to motor carrier varies with the weight of the <br /> bound the probable outcome of HB 2210 vehicle, the number of miles traveled, and the <br /> implementation. Arange of fuel efficiency axle configuration. Certain qualifying motor <br /> losses of 2 to 10 percent was examined, carriers, such as those transporting logs, wood <br /> overlaid with the staggered phased-in chips, sand and gravel, may pay the highway <br /> implementation. The scenario adopted for this use tax based on a flat monthly fee. The <br /> forecast rests on the most reasonable weight-mile revenue and transaction totals <br /> assumption that there will be, on net, a 2 discussed in this report include this "flat-fee" <br /> <br /> percent decline in fuel efficiency with the new revenue as well as revenues from a small <br /> blend. In the event that fuel efficiency losses number of related fees. <br /> are greater than this baseline scenario, the <br /> <br /> positive revenue impact on the State Highway An estimate of weight-mile "transactions" <br /> Fund will be understated. As such, the provides the basis for the current forecast of <br /> forecast will turn out to be conservative and, weight-mile revenues. This methodology, also <br /> in essence, serve as a lower bound for the used for prior forecasts, constructs a measure <br /> motor fuels revenue prospects, all else equal. of weight-mile transactions by dividing <br /> weight-mile revenue by the tax rate paid by <br /> Against these economic and current law the typical heavy vehicle. The forecasting <br /> backdrops, the outlook for consumption to model incorporates several employment <br /> grow at a somewhat steady annual average measures, as well as real fuel prices to <br /> rate of 2.2 percent once the dip in 2008-2009 estimate weight-mile transactions. <br /> is behind us. This is about the same as prior <br /> forecast once Oregon and the nation climbs As Figure 5 illustrates, the number of weight- <br /> back on their respective growth paths. A mile transactions grew quite strongly between <br /> large part of this rebound stems from the FY03 and FY06, averaging about 4.2 percent <br /> impacts from HB 2210 on passenger vehicle annual growth. However, slight declines of <br /> fuel efficiency. less than 1.0 percent occurred during both <br /> FY07 and FY08. The primary causes of these <br /> declines include high fuel prices, a struggling <br /> Mofor Carrier national economy, and a reduction in Oregon <br /> durable goods manufacturing employment. <br /> Truckin activit and the frei ht industr The forecast anticipates a return to positive <br /> g y g y rowth in wei ht-mile transactions in FY10 <br /> affect the amount of revenue available to the g g <br /> State Hi hwa Fund throu h the wei ht-mile as real gasoline prices slowly decline from the <br /> g y g g current hi h levels and Ore on em to ment <br /> <br /> tax, heavy vehicle registration fees, and other g g , p Y <br /> Motor Carrier fees. Chan es in economic in durable goods manufacturing begins to <br /> g rebound. Overall an avera e annual rowth <br /> conditions within Oregon and the nation as a ~ g g <br /> whole influence each of these revenue rate of 3.9 percent is expected between FY10 <br /> sources. Because man as ects of the national and FY15. <br /> y p <br /> and state economies are predicted to weaken <br /> during the next few years, the forecast of <br /> Motor Carrier revenues reflects similar <br /> softness. <br /> The weight-mile tax is the largest source of <br /> <br /> trucking-related revenue. This highway use <br /> 9 <br /> <br />