New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-97-07-F
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-97-07-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 4:11:44 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 11:04:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
MWMC SDC Methodology
Document_Date
7/2/1997
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 7 <br /> Amendment Process and Schedule <br /> 1/6/97 Notification of intent to amend tfie SDC Methodology sent to interested parties. <br /> 1/21/97 Notice of proposed changes will be provided to City Council and Mayor, published in the Register-Guard, and <br /> copies of the proposed methodology changes and fee schedule will be made available far review at Eugene City <br /> Hail, Public Works Building Lobby, Permit and Information Center Lobby, and Eugene Public l.(brary. <br /> 1/21/97 A 30-day public comment period will open. Those wishing to comment on the proposed changes must do so in <br /> writing. These comments should be sent to the Public Works Department via fax (541-882-5032) or by mail to 858 <br /> Pearl Street, Eugene, OR 97401. <br /> 1/30/97 Public information session will be held in the Sloat Room at the Permit and information Center in the Atrium <br /> Building, at 99 W. 10thAvenue from 6:30 - 8:00 p.m. Staff will be available to respond to questions regarding the <br /> proposed changes. <br /> 2/20/97 Public comment period will close. <br /> 3/1/97 New SDC Methodology and rates will apply to all valid building permits applied for on or crier this date. <br /> <br /> What Accounts for the Increased Rates? <br /> Eugene's arterial and collector network. 'These examples <br /> <br /> The proposed rate changes are necessary to more accurately are inputs into the Transportation SDC, and bring the analy- <br /> reflect the City's actual costs to construct new facilities. No sis into conformance with the assumptions currently being <br /> changes are proposed in the basic Council-adopted policies developed for TransPlan, the regional transportation plan- <br /> which frame the SDC rate structure. The definition of the ring process. <br /> individual "systems" for purposes of cost recovery, and the <br /> types of development which participate in individual sys- See the attached table "City of Eugene Current and Proposed <br /> tem costs, will remain the same. The increases are reflective SDCs" for a listing of the current and proposed rates. <br /> of changed prices for the construction of major capital im- <br /> provements needed to serve new development. How Does .Eugene Compare to <br /> Other Communities? <br /> When the City revised its SDC ordinance in 1991, the rate <br /> structure was based in part upon an evaluation of system Many Oregon communities are experiencing increases in <br /> costs, including existing reserve capacity as well'as planned construction costs. In 1995, City staff gathered comparative <br /> improvements, as described in master plans and the Capi- data for a number of Oregon communities' SDC rates. That <br /> tal Improvement Plan (CIP). The cost to construct the information has been updated to reflect current rates. <br /> planned system as well as the value of the existing system Eugene's proposed changes would result in fees that are in <br /> available to serve new development was reestimated in 1996. the middle of the range relative to these other communities. <br /> The analysis shows that these costs have increased onaver- See the attached charts "Comparison of SDCs for 5 Sample <br /> age by 65% to 75%, depending upon the system. When the Developments°' for a graphical comparison of rates for five <br /> effect of cost adjustments adopted since 1991 is factored out, project types. <br /> the resulting fee increases range from 40-50%, again vary- ~ ' ~ ' <br /> ing by the individual system. ~ • ~ r <br /> The annual inflation adjustments which have been put in The following documents are available by requesting cop- <br /> place since 1991 relied on a national index (the Engineering ies from the Public Works Department at 682-5291: <br /> News-Record Construction Cost Index) which has not kept <br /> pace with the inflation in construction costs locally. Just as • The proposed SDC Methodology document showing <br /> the average price to construct a single family home has in- text to be changed. <br /> creased 60%-65% since 1991, the cost to construct streets, • The financial analysis prepared for the City by Lane <br /> sewers, bike paths, and parks has risen dramatically in re- Council of Governments regarding changes in construc- <br /> sponse to a number of local economic factors. These in- tion costs. <br /> elude the price of land (a particularly strong factor in the <br /> Parks SDC), the high demand for construction material and If your organization would like to request a brief presenta- <br /> laborers,and the effect of environmental and legal changes. tion by staff regarding the proposed changes, please call tlj <br /> SDC Coordinator at 682-6823. In addition, the City main- <br /> The final proposed rates also reflect the effect of updating tains a list of interested parties who are notified of changes <br /> non-cost variables in the methodology, such as the average to the SDC methodology and rates. In order to add your <br /> trip length, and the percentage of each trip which uses name to the list, please contact the SDC Coordinator. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.