<br /> i. <br /> . 1 ~ <br /> Public Works <br /> - Engineering <br /> City of Eugene <br /> 858 Pearl Street <br /> _ Eugene, OR 97401 <br /> (541) 682-6823 <br /> opose Changes to <br /> stems Development Charges (SDCs) <br /> t Are Syste Development Charge ` F <<, <br /> C) Fees? .~~;y,~ <br /> S t Developmen Charge (SDC) fees have been collected <br /> b e City of Eugen since 1978, and similar types of fees ` . , :_:;r- <br /> v been charged by e City as far back as 1948. SDC " <br /> f are 'collected w n new development or ex- ' <br /> ion,occurs in City. The fees are used to <br /> a pprtion of the c nstruction of infrastructure <br /> as wastewater d stormwater drainage sys- <br /> streets, and par facilities. SDC funds are <br /> to 1'telp the City rovide for the increased ca- <br /> p ci needed to se new development, main- <br /> - and safety tandards, and recoup a por- <br /> n f tote communi s investment in the infrastruc- <br /> tha~ is already ' place. Examples of projects funded <br /> ghSDCs includ wastewater pump stations and trunk <br /> oflt street bike ths; arterial and collector sheet con- <br /> s lion or capacity nhancement; and acquisition and de- <br /> v omeant of park la ' <br /> with a change of use for either 3,000 s.f. of floor space <br /> t ~ ~~g~ ~ ~ or when 50% of the floor space changes use. The pro- <br /> posed methodology would lower the 3,000 s. f. thresh- <br /> 'ty~ of Eugene 'odically reviews its Systems Develop- old to 1,000 s.f.. <br /> Charge Method ~g3' program to assess its effectiveness .Where SDCs are reduced due to impact mitigation <br /> assure the fees resent the City's cost of construction. on site, the improvement must be permanent, rather <br /> S coz~tpleted a revi during 1996. This was ilte first com- than having a ten year life span. <br /> p ` e look at the program since 1992 This review was . Stormwater detention €acilities will no longer be eli- <br /> te~tded tom underlying Council-adopted policy <br /> SDCs, but ensure that the methodology and fee Bible for SDC credit. Retention facilities, such as dry <br /> s continue to 'vel su rt exis h Con- ~^'e~~ X11 continue to be eligible. <br /> y PP° ~ ~ ~ • Annual u ates to account for than es in construc- <br /> cl ns m this revi w include the following: 1~ $ <br /> lion cost will be based on the best available informa- <br /> Tt~e cost of co traction locally has increased faster tion, ranter than exclusively on the Engineering News- <br /> 'the national verage upon which annual updates Record Construction Cost Index. <br /> t the SDC rates ve been based. This means that the • A cap of $30,000 on the administrative charge col- <br /> tes must increa in order to recover sufficient funds lected with any one permit will be established. <br /> t construct SDC ligible capital projects. <br /> 4) With an increase in rates, the percentage multiplier <br /> )Overall, the me odology document continues to be used to calculate the administrative charge will drop from <br /> effective tool fo administering the SDC program. The 7,25% will drop to 5%. <br /> rmat of the docu ent is being revised to make it easier <br /> interpret and u date. 5) Based on a resolution passed by the Metropolitan <br /> Wastewater Management Commission, the method for <br /> I'~ ) Several practic are proposed for revision, including: calculating regional wastewater SDCs will be modified <br /> • Currently, a ansportation SDC may be collected to include a new "large volume user" classification. <br /> <br />