New Search
EXHIBIT A (page 2 of 6) <br /> . <br /> Table 5 <br /> <br /> f <br /> WMC (Reg oval) Wastewater Systems Development Charge Analysis <br /> 1'. Analysis of gional Wastewater System Value <br /> D Total A sets $202,210,388 <br /> ~ Total Li bilities ($131,714,700) <br /> Local Equi y (net assets) $70,495,688 <br /> . <br /> D Wet W ather Peak Flow Im rovements $6,170,000 <br /> 2 MWMC Syste Capacity and Allocation of Capital Values <br /> hancements <br /> d Ca aci En <br /> ' B. Planne <br /> S stem E uit <br /> A. Existin <br /> tY <br /> _ 9 Y q Y _ _ p <br /> t Com onent <br /> Percen of <br /> esi n Percent of Com onent Desi n <br /> D 9 p 9 p <br /> ~ Capacity Facility Cost Value Capacity Facility Cost Value <br /> 49,000,000 22.00% $15,509,000 0 0% $0 <br /> .<'!R> 175,000,000 43.00% $30,313,000 16,000,000 100% $6,170,000 <br /> 66 000 19% 13 394 000 0 0% $0 <br /> 71 600 16% 11 279 000 0 0% $0 <br /> $ <br /> '~~<~''~#~;~l 100% $70,495,000 100% $6,170,000 <br /> A. Average D ily Flow: <br /> Cost of Co ponent _ Design flow =Cost per gallon of average daily flow <br /> [ $15,509, 00 T 49,000,000 gallons per day = $0.317 per gallon of average daily flow ] <br /> B. Peak Flow (allocates peak wet weather capacity to average user flow): <br /> Cost of Pe k Flow Component _ Average Design flow =Cost of peak flow capacity per gallon of average <br /> daily flow <br /> [ ($30,313 00 +$6,170,000) _ 49,000,000 gallons per day = $0.745 per gallon of average daily flow ] <br /> C. Biochemi I Oxygen Demand (BOD): <br /> Cost of BO Component + Design BOD daily capacity =Cost per pound of BOD per day <br /> [ $13,394,0 0 + 66,000 pounds per day = $202.94 per pound ] <br /> D. Suspend Solids (SS): <br /> Cost of S Component + Design SS daily capacity =Cost per pound of SS per day <br /> [ $11,279, 00 + 71,600 pounds per day = $157.53 per pound ] <br /> The unit cost f Peak Flow is calculated on the basis of average daily plant capacity of 49,000,000 <br /> to enable reco ery of costs from system users. <br /> City of Eugen SDC Methodology Page D-9 <br /> <br />