New Search
II whic , is proposed to be added in section 2.1(2)(d) is incorrect and should be <br /> delet d. <br /> Finding: Section 2.1(2)(d) is not specific to only the transportation system <br /> and t erefore has not been revised. <br /> In addition t the revisions noted in the above comments and findings, staff identified some <br /> corrections t typographical errors which have also been incorporated in Exhibit A hereto. <br /> F. Based on the findings and staff recommendations set forth above, I find that <br /> the revision to the Systems Development Charge Methodology and fees as set forth in <br /> Exhibit A he eto are consistent with adopted policies and ordinances of the City, are in <br /> conformity ith applicable state law, and should be implemented effective September 15, <br /> 1999. <br /> On t e basis of these findings, I order that: <br /> 1. The revisions to the City's Systems Development Charge Methodology, <br /> attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein, are hereby adopted, effective <br /> September 5, 1999. <br /> 2. Except as amended herein, the Systems Development Charge Methodology <br /> as adopted r amended by Administrative Order Nos. 58-97-02-F, 58-97-07-F and 58-98- <br /> 10-F, shall r main in full force and effect. <br /> Date this ~3 day of September, 1999 <br /> ~ <br /> James .Johnson <br /> City Manager <br /> I <br /> i <br /> ~I Administrativ Order - 3 <br /> <br /> ~ III r:\adminord\fees\99 dc2ao1.wpd(09/09/99) <br /> I. <br /> I I <br /> I <br /> i 1, <br /> <br />