New Search
I; amending the SDC code provisions. As a result of that testimony, the Council chose to <br /> defer action on the ordinance until a future date. Deferral of Council action on the <br /> ~ ordinance affected the implementation of revisions to the local wastewater SDC as <br /> originally proposed and noted in Finding B above. Staff therefore recommended deferral <br /> of all proposed revisions specific to the local wastewater SDC. <br /> E. All SDC revisions originally proposed, other than for the local wastewater SDC, <br /> were approved by Administrative Order 58-99-16-F-1 and implemented on September 15, <br /> 1999. On September 15, 1999 the Council adopted an ordinance amending the SDC <br /> ! provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971. The ordinance is now in effect, and the revisions <br /> previously proposed with respect to the local wastewater SDC can now be implemented, <br /> as reflected in the attached Exhibit A. <br /> I <br /> ! F. Oral comments directed to the proposed local wastewater SDC provisions were <br /> made during the 30-day public comment period provided for the initial Administrative Order. <br /> Subsequent to adoption of Administrative Order 58-99-16-F-1, staff has also noted minor <br /> revisions needed to the previously adopted regional (MWMC) wastewater SDC. In <br /> response to those comments and staff recommendations, Imake the following specific <br /> findings: <br /> Comment on revision to the local wastewater SDC: The reference to the <br /> specific RA zoning district in Section 2.1(1)(c) should be changed to be inclusive of <br /> all types of residential zoning districts that meet the intent of the statement. <br /> Finding: The reference has been changed to include any residential zoning <br /> district as noted in Section 9.384 of the Eugene Code, 1971. <br /> I <br /> i <br /> ~ Comment on revision to Table 1: The document referenced within Table <br /> 1 of the methodology as the source document for information pertaining to the local <br /> ~ wastewater cost basis should be revised to reflect the CH2M Hill document entitled <br /> ~ Gravit,.y Sewer Lines System Valuation. <br /> Finding: Table 1 of the methodology has been revised to reflect this <br /> document. <br /> ! Comment on revision to the local wastewater SDC: Provide clarification <br /> ~ that a rate per PFU may also be assigned by the City Engineer should a proposed <br /> use not be represented by one of the published SDC Use Codes and for which the <br /> default flow assignment is not appropriate. <br /> Finding: This clarification has been made by inclusion of a statement at the <br /> ~ bottom of Attachment 2, Local Wastewater Plumbing Fixture Unit Rates. <br /> f Administrative Order - 2 <br /> <br /> fir! <br /> i <br /> i <br /> <br />