New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-02-25-F
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-02-25-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:27:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Geological Analysis Standards
Document_Date
3/31/2002
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Finding: EC 9.6710(2) establishes that a geological and geotechnical analysis can be <br /> prepared by either an Oregon licensed Engineering Geologist or an Oregon <br /> licensed Civil Engineer with geotechnical experience; the Rule describes <br /> these two professionals under the general term "Qualified Registered <br /> Professional." The Rule cannot establish standards that are more stringent <br /> than the Code. Because the Code permits either an Oregon licensed <br /> Engineering Geologist or an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer to fulfill the <br /> requirements of EC 9.6710, the Rule cannot heighten the Code requirement <br /> by requiring a Registered Professional Engineer to perform certain functions <br /> and by requiring applicants to retain a certified Engineering Geologist to <br /> assist with other functions. No change is being made to this provision as a <br /> result of this comment. <br /> Comment 16: R-9.6710-J. The Administrative Rule is unclear regarding the City's process <br /> for approving other professionals that can verify subsurface conditions during <br /> the construction phase for projects requiring a Leve13 analysis. <br /> Finding: R-9.6710-J has been deleted. <br /> Comment 17: R-9.6710-J. It is unclear who is allowed to retain the construction <br /> verification service. <br /> Finding: R-9.6710-J has been deleted. <br /> Comment 18: R-9.6710-J. The Administrative Rule does not provide a procedure for <br /> reporting discrepancies. <br /> Finding: R-9.6710-J has been deleted. <br /> Comment 19: Will there be a final report required on the earthwork related construction <br /> when it is completed? <br /> Finding: Final reports are controlled by the permitting agencies and not a requirement <br /> of land use approval. The Rule is adopted pursuant to EC 9.6710, a land use <br /> approval criteria. It is the professional's responsibility to guide and direct the <br /> developer in what is necessary to obtain a construction permit and construct <br /> a safe and structurally sound facility. Public improvement permitting and <br /> construction procedures are outlined in the City's Public Improvement <br /> Design Standards Manual. <br /> Comment 20: Appendix A. Expressing concern about the minimum number of test holes <br /> recommended in the Appendix. <br /> Finding: Rule R-9.6710, Appendix A has been revised to reduce the minimum number <br /> of recommended test holes for land divisions. <br /> Comment Z1: The establishment of these standards creates a legal precedent for practice in <br /> a field that relies a great deal on experience and judgment, and therefore <br /> markedly increases the potential for litigation involving the practicing <br /> professional and the City of Eugene. <br /> <br /> Administrative Order - 4 <br /> R:WDM INORD\RULES\03geotech2ao.wpd(03/26/03) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.