Comment 8: R-9.6710-A. The term Representative Sample should be Representative <br /> i Disturbed Sample. The term Soil Disturbance should be Site Disturbance. <br /> Finding: The "Representative Sample" term has been changed. The definition of "Soil <br /> Disturbance" was clarified, but the term itself is used in the Code and was not <br /> - changed. <br /> Comment 9: General word smithing comments and suggestions regarding Sections R- <br /> 9.6710-B, R-9.6710-C and R-9.6710-D. <br /> Finding: These sections recite, verbatim, code language and cannot be changed <br /> without an ordinance amending the code. No change is being made to this <br /> provision as a result of these comments. <br /> Comment 10: R-9.6710-F 4.2. How can a Qualified Registered Professional fully address <br /> groundwater elevations and the presence of expansive soils when no <br /> subsurface investigation is performed for a Level 1 investigation? <br /> Finding: R-9.6710-F 4.2 has been deleted. <br /> Comment 11: R-9.6710-H 1.4. Terms of timing, extent, and mechanics are applicable <br /> I! mostly to slope movements. The sentence should end after the word "site." <br /> f <br /> I <br /> 1 Finding: R-9.6710-H 1.4 has been changed. <br /> Comment 12: R-9.6710-H 2.3. Engineering properties of Soil. This section repeats <br /> information given in Section R-9.6710-A. <br /> i <br /> Finding: Changes have been made to eliminate the repetition. <br /> Comment 13: R-9.6710-H 3.8.1. The intent of this section is not clear and it should be <br /> removed from the proposed Administrative Rule. <br /> a <br /> ! , <br /> ~ ' Finding: R-9.6710-H 3.8.1 has been deleted. <br /> Comment 14: R-9.6710-J -Alternate Methods of Investigations. The approval process for <br /> an alternate method of investigation will likely be time consuming and the <br /> basis for approval is unclear. <br /> Finding: R-9.6710-J.3 has been changed to require that the City issue a decision on a <br /> ~ request for deviation within 30 days of receipt of the written request. The <br /> Rules cannot establish a standard basis for approval because the nature of the <br /> I~! potential alternate method is unknown. Approval of proposed alternate <br /> methods of investigation will be on a case by case basis. R-9.6710-J.3.1, <br /> however, has been changed to provide additional detail regarding what the <br /> alternate investigation method must include. <br /> Comment 15: R-9.6710-J. Design recommendations for structures and construction should <br /> be observed by a Registered Professional Engineer. If geology is an issue, the <br /> Re istered Professional En ine r <br /> e ma decide to retain a certified En ineerin <br /> Geologist to assist. g y g g <br /> <br /> ~rr Administrative Order - 3 <br /> R:IADMINORDUtULES~03geotech2ao.wpd(03/26/03) <br /> <br />