New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Fleet Facility
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Fleet Facility
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 10:00:20 AM
Creation date
8/6/2008 9:49:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Fleet
PWA_Project_Area
Execs
PW_Subject
Fleet Facility
Document_Date
9/26/2008
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This recent feasibility study stated the following: <br /> "The Public works 2004 Roosevelt Yard Master Plan shows improvements in yard circulation patterns <br /> and operational efficiencies if the current vehicle and radio maintenance facilities are removed and <br /> rebuilt elsewhere in the yard, and removing old fleet and radio facilities would also eliminate a <br /> maintenance and operations liability, a critical benefit. The master <br /> plan identified property on Garf <br /> eld <br /> as suitable in adjacency to the yard, access to Garfield, and size. Terms of the Garfield site's leases are <br /> nearly all completed and tenants are on a month to month basis, with the exception of the cell tower. <br /> Therefore Fleet Services has assumed basing this study on the availability of the Garfteld site. <br /> In the summer of 2006, Fleet Services was directed by the Fleet Advisory Board to provide a feasibility <br /> study to find out what would be involved in replacing these facilities...... <br /> ....Facilities was contacted in late 2006 to assist in conducting the feasibility study to determine the <br /> appropriate scope to bring existing Fleet and Radio facilities up to current industry standards, and <br /> develop a project budget corresponding to the current needs and standards. " <br /> The feasibility study proposed an initial cost estimate for a new facility at approximately $30 million. Facilities <br /> and Fleet staff again looked at the findings of the study to determine where cost savings could be realized by <br /> utilizing existing equipment and re-designing vehicle work bays to include amulti-use concept, which helped <br /> reduce overall square footage needs for operations. This reassessment of the facility design lowered the new <br /> facility cost estimate to approximately $21 million. <br /> Facilities, Fleet and Maintenance staff presented the revised information to the financial advisory group for this <br /> new fleet maintenance building (consisting of staff from PW, Facilities and Finance) in October 2007 and <br /> recommended Fleet Services work with the architecture consultants to review the staff-proposed reductions to <br /> the facility. and determine if the $21 million estimate is a realistic figure. Additionally, the programming <br /> reductions will need to be evaluated to determine their potential impact to achieving LEED certification for the <br /> <br /> . new facility. Facilities staff estimated the cost of performing the additional feasibility study would be <br /> approximately $30,000. This additional cost for the feasibility study review will be paid from the Fleet <br /> Operations Fund balance available, not from an increase in operating rate revenue. <br /> Financial Overview <br /> The financial impact fora $21 million Fleet Facility would require approximately $2 million per year to service <br /> the debt over the course of a 20 year period. The General Fund's burden of this annual funding need is <br /> approximately $1 million. Fleet Staff has analyzed allocating the cost of the facility to Fleet users under two <br /> different methods: either by value of equipment, or by use of the facility (ie, labor hours spent on equipment). <br /> Under either method, the General Fund's burden is approximately half of the cost. The other half of the facility <br /> cost would be allocated to those dedicated funds which own fleet and radio equipment. <br /> If financially viable, the timeline for the new Fleet and Radio Communication Facility would be to hire design <br /> consultants by July 2008, with the design process requiring approximately one year to complete. Construction <br /> would begin in FY10 with projected completion in FYl 1. <br /> Next Steus <br /> The financial advisory group for this new facility project has recommended that Fleet Services move forward on <br /> hiring consultants to further refine the cost estimate and staff-proposed programming reductions to the initial <br /> feasibility study. Upon completion of this next step, Fleet Services will bring to the Executive Management <br /> Team, a proposal for a new facility, with refined cost estimate and funding options. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.