New Search
COREY Kurt A <br /> From: LANKSTON Jeff <br /> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:13 AM <br /> To: CARLSON Jim R; MURDOCH Kitty M; HAMM Cindi M <br /> Cc: HARDT DeeAnn; COREY Kurt A; SVENDSEN Glen L; KOLB Randy C <br /> ' Subject: RE: Fleet Rates <br /> Kitt will have th <br /> y e new and sur lus vehicles list toda . <br /> p Y <br /> 1 Thanks, <br /> Jeff <br /> x4813 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: CARLSON Jim R <br /> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:51 AM <br /> To: MURDOCH Kitty M; HAMM Cindi M <br /> Cc: HARDT DeeAnn; COREY Kurt A; LANKSTON Jeff; SVENDSEN Glen L; KOLB Randy C <br /> Subject: RE: Fleet Rates <br /> <br /> i <br /> Sounds like we will have to consider this item on the 14th and insert answer into forecast quickly. <br /> Kurt, Jeff- we need help from fleet if they want us to consider this change. <br /> Jim <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: MURDOCH Kitty M <br /> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:51 PM <br /> To: CARLSON Jim R; HAMM Cindi M <br /> Cc: HARDT DeeAnn <br /> Subject: RE: Fleet Rates <br /> Hi Jim: I don't believe I can be prepared with the historical info by next Thursday for an Exec discussion. We <br /> need to review 5 years of fund history and GF adjustments to baselines. This is manual work since our systems <br /> don't track old components of decision packages. We are swamped with opening the budget system, training new <br /> users, baseline updates, SB#1 journal review, and setting up training for new BC members. We are already <br /> working the weekend on these items. I also think we need to talk as a small group before going to Execs on these <br /> rates. I estimate it will take us 10-15 hours to understand the history and I have not yet received the info from <br /> Fleet I asked for regarding vehicle adds and cost centers. We could still talk Fleet increase on Nov. 14t" with <br /> Execs -after the forecast discussion -and still make decisions before the mailout late Thursday afternoon or do <br /> the BC mailout on Friday. It would be last minute, but it would probably be more meaningful. And, to put in my <br /> itch one more time I still don't understand wh Fleet is different than the rest of the internal service funds. --Kitt <br /> p <br /> Y Y <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: CARLSON Jim R <br /> Sent: Wednesday, 30 October, 2002 5:12 PM <br /> To: HAMM Cindi M <br /> Cc: HARDT DeeAnn; MURDOCH Kitty M; COREY Kurt A; LANKSTON Jeff <br /> Subject: RE: Fleet Rates <br /> We should talk about it Nov 7. We absolutely need to send out the forecast not hand it out at the meeting. <br /> I have had my meeting with Glen and Randy (yesterday). There are no similar issues for them. Glen was <br /> surprised because he developed and managed the fleet rate system prior to going to Facilities. He was <br /> trying to remember what happened during 47/50 but could not. ISD provided rate holidays (saving money <br /> as one time) rather than reducing rates on an on-going basis. Facilities has a $70,000 gap between <br /> appropriations and revenue but they will continue to live with it for now. <br /> Jim <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: HAMM Cindi M <br /> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:32 PM <br /> To: CARLSON Jim R <br /> Cc: HARDT DeeAnn; MURDOCH Kitty M; COREY Kurt A; LANKSTON Jeff <br /> Subject: Fleet Rates <br /> Kitty and I had a conversation today about next steps in establishing the FY04 fleet rates -following <br /> our meeting last week with you, Kurt and Jeff. <br /> 1 <br /> - <br /> <br />