New Search
42 List zoning designations being impacted I-3 <br />43 Regign Planner's opinion that the project conforms with (If not, why not?): <br />44 o Transportation Planning Rule Contacted Tom Boyatt. Project will conform. <br />45 o Statewide Planning Goals ves <br />46 o Comprehensive Plan (county/city or both) Yes, as updated <br />Part 3 Attachment, Page 2 <br />I Project Key No. <br />High St. to Hilyazd <br />NOISE <br />47 ®YES ^ NO ^ UNK Any shift in horizontal or vertical alignment? Amount of shift: Horizontal _500 feet m (ft.); Vertical _0.0 m (ft.) <br />48 ®YES ^ NO ^ UNK Does project increase the number of travel lanes? Existing number of lanes _3 west Proposed number of lanes 4 west <br />49 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Any known noise problems/complamts? No current problems are known but a noise study is recommended as part. of the project <br />development. The existing motel on Hilyard and Franklin will need to be studied. <br />50 Approximate number of buildings/activity areas within 61 meters (200-feet) of proposed R/VV line: Commercial 7 Industrial 0 Public l <br />51 Residences 4 Schools 0 Churches 0 Parks 0 <br />SECTION 4(f) POTENTIAL ' <br />52 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Parks, wildlife refuges, historic properties, public recreational areas, etc. impacted? (explain) No anticipated impacts to historic ProP~es, <br />parks, or public recreational areas. <br />SECTION 6(fl POTENTIAL <br />53 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Land & Water Conservation Funds used to acquire parks, etc.? <br />SOCIOECONOMICS <br />54 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Do building displacements appear key to economy/neigbborhood7 <br />55 Number of building displacements: An existing rar lot and small building <br />56 General use of adjacent land: Residential ® Commercial ® Fatmland/Range ^ Public ® Other ^ (explain) Most of the surrounding site is formerly industrial. <br />57 Estimate of number of people living adjacent to project: 0-30 ®; 31-100 ^; 100+ ^ <br />58 Estimate of number of people working adjacent to project 0-30 ®; 31-100 ^; 100+ ^ <br />59 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Divide of disnrpt an established community, or affect neighborhood character or stability? The plan for the area. is to reinforce the <br />connectivity between the Court House District and Downtown Eugene. By routing the west bound Hwy 99 traffic to the north and making improvements to the pedestrian <br />crossing at 8"' and Mill, the connection will be improved. <br />60 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Affect minority, elderly, handicapped, low income, transit-dependent, or other specific interest group? <br />VLSUAL <br />61 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Designated Scenic Highway? <br />62 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Oregon Forest Practices Act restrictions apply? <br />63 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Major cut/fills? <br />ti4 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Bridges or tinge retaining walls anticipated? <br />65 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Any rivers on the Oregon Scenic Waterway listing? <br /> <br />b6 ^ YES <br />®NO _ <br />^ UNK Any rivers on dte Federal Wild and Scenic River Listing? <br />WATER WAYSJWATER QIIALiTY <br />67 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Does city/county comp plan list any water resources as Goa15 resources? <br />68 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Within FEMA 100-year flood plain? <br />69 ^ YES ~ NO ^ UNK Within FEMA regulated floodway? <br />70 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Water quality limited stream impacted? _With drainage discharging into the Willamette River water quality will be a consideration in the <br />Project design. The Willamette river is an ESA listed stream and therefor: water quality and water temperature should be considered in the design of We drainage system. <br />71 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Any active wells impacted? <br />72 ®YES ^ NO ^ UNK ADT of 10,000 or greater? <br />73 ®YES ^ NO ^ UNK Navigable waterways? Willamette River although not affected by the projecK. <br />74 ®YES ^ NO ^ UNK Is stream ~ ODFW Rivers Information System database? <br />75 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Any irrigation districts impacted? <br />76 If streams affected what is the fisheries stream classification? ODF W did not lmow the 5sheries stream classification <br />WETLANDS <br />77 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK National wetlands inventory maps indicate any potential concerns? <br />78 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Soil conservation maps indicate hydric soils in project areal See attached map. <br />79 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Local Comprehensive Plan show any wetlands as protected resources? <br />80 ^ YES ®NO ^ UNK Riparian or wetland vegetation evident from visual inspection? The area has been develo over man <br />Ped y years and has very little native <br />vegetation. <br />#####################i####i#i-#####i################f###########################i############i########################t#################### <br />PERMITS <br />81 ^ YES ®NO US Corps of Engineers Section 404 <br />82 ^ YES ®NO DSL Removal and Fill <br />83 ^ YES ®NO DEQ Indirect Source (Air) <br />84 ®YES ^ NO PUC (railroad) <br />85 ^ YES ®NO DOGAMI <br />86 ^ YES ®NO Coast Guard <br />(lam) <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />