EWEB Advisory Group (EAG) Issue Summary <br /> Expansion of City-EWEB Billing Agreement to Include TSMF <br /> Issue: The City is formally requesting that the EWEB Board consider an expansion of <br /> the current EWEB-City joint billing agreement to allow for billing of a <br /> transportation system maintenance fee on the current EWEB billing statement, <br /> .which we believe offers the lowest cost and least complicated alternative. <br /> City Staff: Becky Carlson, Public Works (Lead), Tish Peterson, Public Works <br /> (Implementation Lead) <br /> EWEB Staff: Deb Brewer, Government Affairs (Lead); Dick Varner, Finance; Greg Armstead, <br /> Information Services <br /> Historical Summary: <br /> Faced with a growing backlog of street preservation projects and significant pending reductions <br /> in our funding for street operations and maintenance activities, the Eugene City Council directed <br /> in February that the City Manager return to them with a proposal for reestablishing a <br /> Transportation System Maintenance Fee (TSMF) to address these critical transportation funding <br /> needs. <br /> The Eugene City Council adopted in 2002 and then later repealed a TSMF. As part of the city's <br /> implementation efforts for that earlier TSMF ordinance, the EWEB Board considered and <br /> rejected the option of adding another city line item to the existing EWEB bill format. As a result <br /> of that decision, KamTech Systems, LLC, was hired by the City to prepare an analysis of various <br /> remaining billing options available for meeting the billing requirements for a TSMF. One of <br /> their primary conclusions was that EWEB's billing system is an asset that cannot be overlooked <br /> by the City with respect to options available for billing the TSMF. They further concluded that <br /> the more the existing billing system can be utilized in billing for the TSMF, the lower the cost of <br /> collection for the City and, ultimately, the community. They also noted in their conclusions that <br /> "all separate billing options are considerably more expensive than the current joint billing <br /> agreement" between the City and EWEB. <br /> There are a number of reasons it continues to make sense for the City and EWEB to consider <br /> expansion of the current joint billing agreement to allow for billing of the TSMF on the EWEB <br /> bill. The primary one, of course, is reduced joint costs. The costs of monthly billing, software <br /> licensing, system operation and maintenance, and certain customer services (e.g., starting and <br /> stopping of services) can be shared and divided by the two entities instead of imposed as <br /> duplicate service charges on our citizens. In addition, expensive data systems can be shared <br /> instead of duplicated, including information on customer, premise and. consumption. Since the <br /> City is willing to pay for all initial costs of system modification and implementation for the <br /> TSMF, the expansion of this long-standing joint billing agreement offers opportunity for long- <br /> term cost savings for EWEB customers, as well, since relatively fixed ongoing operating costs <br /> <br /> would be allocated across yet .another utility system, resulting in lower ongoing billing costs for <br /> all of the systems. <br /> <br />