New Search
• The public facility plan shall contain "...a list of the significant public facility projects <br /> which are to support the land uses designated in the acknowledged comprehensive <br /> plan." (OAR 660-0 l 1-0010) <br /> • The public facility plan shall contain a map or written description of each public <br /> . facility project's general location or service area." (OAR 660-O11-0010) <br /> • The public facilities plan shall contain "...policy statements or urban growth . <br /> management agreements identifying the provider of each public facility system, and <br /> a discussion of the provider's existing funding mechanisms and the ability of these <br /> and possible new mechanisms to fund the development of each public facility project <br /> or system." (OAR 660-0 l l -0010) <br /> • The project lists and maps in the Metro Plan and the PFSP do not identify sanitary sewer <br /> extension to Coburg or to rural lands as is required by OAR 660-O11-0060 Sewer Service <br /> to Rural Lands. The Metro Plan and PFSP do not mention sewer extensions beyond the <br /> UGB except to "The area of the Eugene Airport designated Government and <br /> Education on the Metro Plan diagram, the Seasonal Industrial Waste Facility, the <br /> Regional Wastewater Biosolids Management Facility, and agricultural sites used for <br /> land application of biosolids and cannery byproducts. These sites serve the entire <br /> metropolitan area." and, <br /> • "An existing development outside the urban growth boundary when it has been <br /> determined that it poses an immediate threat of public health or safety to the <br /> citizens within the Eugene-Springfield urban growth boundarythat can only be <br /> remedied by extension of the service." (Metro Plan, Policy G.25, page III-G-12) <br /> ~ Metro Plan policies do not identify sanitary sewer extension to Coburg; the list of <br /> exceptions to the policies do not identify sanitary sewer extension to Coburg; and the <br /> fundamental principles of the Metro Plan do not identify the provision of public facilities <br /> and services outside the UGB. <br /> • "The Metropolitan Plan is based on the premise that Eugene and Springfield, the <br /> two existing cities, are the logical providers of services accommodating urban levels. <br /> of development within the urban growth boundary." (Metro Plan, Plan Principle #6, <br /> page II-1) <br /> ~ "The Metropolitan Plan was developed to meet the supporting facilities and services <br /> necessary to serve a population of 293,700. That population level may be reached <br /> before or after the year 2000, depending upon the rate of growth. The Plan is based <br /> on the needs of a future population level and not a specific year." (Metro Plan, Plan <br /> Principle #7, page II-1) <br /> State law requires amendments to Chapter III-G of the Metro Plan, and amendments to the <br /> project list and maps in the PFSP and Metro Plan before.extension of sewer to Coburg is <br /> possible. If the strategy to support this amendment is to use an exception policy similar to the . <br /> Airport exception, other chapters in the Plan may need to be reviewed for internal plan <br /> consistency.. This same consideration maybe necessary with regard to the fundamental <br /> <br /> . principles. . <br /> -Lane County Rural Comprehensive Plan (RCPT and Coburg Comprehensive Plan. <br /> The proposal would establish an explicit public policy decision to construct a sewer line from <br /> some specific location in Eugene-Springfield to a specific location in Coburg. As the line leaves <br /> City Council page 447. Page 11 <br /> <br />