Scenario Two Costs <br /> (In 2004 Dollars) <br /> MWMC SDC charges = $8,740,000 <br /> Eugene SDC charges = $1,038,000 <br /> Support Facilities = $ 106,000 <br /> Past Planning Studies = $ 12,000 <br /> Decision Processing = $ 300,000 <br /> Total connection costs =$10,196,375 <br /> COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING (LAND USE) AMENDMENT PROCESSES AND <br /> REQUIRED APPROVALS <br /> This section addresses the .requirements that would need to be satisfied for the Governing Bodies <br /> to lawfully extend wastewater services under Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) pertaining to land <br /> use planning and the implementing Oregon Administrative Rules (OARS). It identifies the <br /> a licable rules, and the as ects of locally-adopted land use plans that would require <br /> pP P <br /> amendments. It also describes the approvals and associated mandated processes that would <br /> apply. Although this analysis was prepared following consultation with planning directors and <br /> <br /> . legal counsels from each jurisdiction,_it should be considered a preliminary assessment at this <br /> time. <br /> Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and the Public Facilities <br /> and Services Plan (PFSP) <br /> ..Compliance with state land use goals (ORS 197, OAR 660) is a requirement of all acknowledged <br /> comprehensive plans. The primary goal that governs public facilities infrastructure (water, <br /> sewer, transportation) is. Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services. The rule implementing this goal <br /> is OAR 660-011 Public Facilities Planning. The rule requires cities with populations greater <br /> than 2,500 to adopt a public facilities plan and incorporate certain elements of the public <br /> facilities plan into the comprehensive plan. <br /> The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the State of Oregon. in April, 1982. Subsequent to <br /> acknowledgement, the Metro Plan has been amended through separate "post-acknowledgement" <br /> action of Eugene and Springfield; through joint adoption of "post-acknowledgement" actions by <br /> Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County; and through the periodic review process, also adopted by <br /> Eugene, Springfield and Lane County. <br /> - The Metro Plan.'s public facilities component, which includes Chapter III-G as well as the <br /> separate functional plan, the PFSP, were prepared, adopted and acknowledged in 1982, updated <br /> in 1987, and updated again in 2001. Chapter III-G of the Metro Plan and the PFSP were <br /> recently amended (2004) with new information related to sanitary sewer service projects and <br /> policies (These latest amendments are currently the subject of multiple"appellate challenges). <br /> • By rule, a public facilities plan "...describes the water, sewer and transportation <br /> facilities which are to support the land uses designated in the appropriate <br /> acknowledged comprehensive plans within an urban growth boundary...".(OAR <br /> 660-011-0005) <br /> City Council page 446 Page 10 <br /> <br />