New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Coburg Connection (4)
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Coburg Connection (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 9:57:09 AM
Creation date
8/6/2008 9:48:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Wastewater
PWA_Project_Area
MWMC
PW_Subject
Coburg Scope Roles
Document_Date
9/26/2008
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 2 <br /> Cities' expectations for the work product; 2) the description of Coburg's participation must be revised to reflect <br /> that they will be kept informed along the way and will have an appropriate opportunity to comment on the end <br /> product, but that they will not be involved in commenting on or guiding the technical work; and 3) that the State's <br /> request to broaden the scope of the study and to have broader involvement of a steering committee is not <br /> acceptable (again, we described the willingness of the Springfield Council to participate hinges on the ability of <br /> staff to manage the project within the predefined parameters that have already been established by the Council). <br /> What I Understood From Our Discussion Monday Night: <br /> My understanding of your perspectives after discussing this with you on Monday is as follows: <br /> 1) The conditions of Springfield's participation (including provision of any staff resources, which are <br /> required for the project to proceed) remain firm as described above, and that your tolerance for ongoing <br /> discussions regarding proposals for broadening the scope and participants is wearing very thin; <br /> 2) You expect that the scope of work and the roles and responsibilities will be redrafted to meet Springfield <br /> Council's expectations; <br /> 3) Both of you would like to meet with Lane County project management staff to review and approve the <br /> scope and roles before the project can move forward; and <br /> 4) If these terms cannot be accommodated by the County,. it's time to recognize that the project cannot move <br /> forward. <br /> Could you please provide me with feedback to make sure I heard you correctly and can accurately represent my <br /> <br /> ,marching orders????? I will revise as you direct or send as-is to Peter Ruffier so he can provide the County with a <br /> clear understanding of where we stand. 'Thanks, and thanks for your patience with this matter. <br /> Susie Smith <br /> Environmental Services/MWMC General Manager <br /> 225 Fifth Street <br /> .Springfield, OR 97477 <br /> phone: 541-726-3697 <br /> fax: 541-726-2309 <br /> 4/24/2006 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.