New Search
<br /> The 2"d Amazon Park Workshop <br /> Questionnaire Results <br /> 11.20.03 <br /> <br /> Questionnaires were distributed at the 2id Workshop to gauge support for the <br /> <br /> concept diagrams which were presented and to help identify priorities. 50 <br /> <br /> questionnaires were returned. Below is a summary of the information collected. <br /> 1) In general, please rate your support for the ideas presented in the concept <br /> diagrams (circle one). Scale of 1 -10 with 10 meaning high support and 1 <br /> meaning low support. <br /> 19 = High Support (8-10) <br /> 9 = Medium Support (4-7) <br /> 7 = Low Support (1-3) <br /> 15 = Didn't respond <br /> 2) Do you feel the concept diagrams meet your needs (circle one) Yes/ No. <br /> 20 = Yes <br /> 11= No <br /> 19 = Didn't Respond <br /> Why or why not? <br /> Why- <br /> ~ Addresses range of improvements. <br /> • There's something for everyone. Too bad everything can't. be done. <br /> • New fields and restoration. <br /> • Eugene residents need more general use turf athletic fields. <br /> • Multi-use fields would help meet th eneeds of a larger percentage of field <br /> users than baseball fields, which can only be used by one group. <br /> • The concepts in the diagrams are important. <br /> • Ideal plan. Is it realistic? <br /> • Improved athletic fields. <br /> • We need more multi-use fields, near where many of us live, but your plan <br /> has adequate natural resource measures. <br /> • Your wish list is great, but obviously a little large. <br /> • Supports additional athletic fields <br /> Why not- <br /> • I would like to see greater stream restoration, however I know there are <br /> other needs. <br /> • When will the city stop taking away baseball opportunities from our kids <br /> and community? <br /> • The elimination of the baseball field is not compatible with the bond <br /> measure. <br /> <br />