New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Green Valley Glen PUD
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Green Valley Glen PUD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 9:58:16 AM
Creation date
8/6/2008 9:47:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
POS
PWA_Project_Area
Stormwater
PW_Subject
Testimony for Green Valley Glen PUD Public Hearing
Document_Date
9/26/2008
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The .need for this project is the likely eminent conversion of the site from natural open space to <br />residential housing. The current owner has proposed to subdivide the property into approximately <br />77-115 new home sites and to construct a road system artd utility infrastructure required to serve <br />these new homes. Joe Green, the owner, has expressed clear intentions of pursuing plans to <br />develop this property with the objective of submitting a development application before Goal 5 <br />protections are implemented in June/July, 2005. <br />Issues Selected for Analysis <br />The scoping process identified the following issues. -These issues serve to focus the analysis and <br />the comparison of alternatives. <br />Issue 1: How would acquisition affect watershed drainage functions? This issue will be <br />assessed by the following measurement indicators: (a) acres of protected riparian area, (b) <br />the length of protected waterways, (c) percent of impervious surtace, and (d) stability of <br />waterways. <br />Issue 2: How would acquisition affect wildlife habitat? This issue will be assessed by the <br />following measurement indicators: (a) acres of habitat vegetated with native forest cover, <br />and (b) contiguity with adjacent wildlife habitat. <br />Issue 3: How would acquisition affect native plant populations? This issue will be assessed by <br />the fallowing measurement indicators: (a) acres of native dominated plant community, (b) <br />acres of site within 50' of a road or cleared area and therefore vulnerable to weed invasion. <br />Issue 4: How would excavating; re-contouring, and re-vegetating with native species affect soil <br />resources? This issue will be assessed by the following measurement indicators: (a) acres <br />of soil disturbed. <br />Federal, State, and -Local Permits Necessary to Implement the Project. <br />• None <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.