New Search
<br /> i <br /> CAHILL Miche le R <br /> From: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Sant: Friday, April 22, 2005 6:36 PM <br /> Ttp: HEIL Richard J <br /> C~: SCHOENING Mark A; HAMLIN Peggy D; BROGDEN Lynn; HIGGINS Teri L; CAHILL Michelle <br /> R <br /> 'S~bject: 4254 4-22-05 Revised Project Estm. Post Bid .xls <br /> ~I <br /> 254 4-22-05 <br /> Re ised Project E... <br /> F2i h - <br /> IWa kand 1 discusse what approach to take for the WW Rehabe 4254 project with the higher than expected bid and the <br /> fUn ing situation wit WW funds. Mark thought we should account for the contract and any PSF through June 30 in the <br /> car ent budget estim to and then do a revised budget for the full anticipated expenses in the new FY. <br /> So have revised yo r estimate (since your at the DOCs and I am out Monday and Tuesday). I put in just $15,000 for <br /> P!S My thought wa I didn't need to be too precise since we won't have much contractor payments before June 30th. <br /> Th new estimate $1 290,570. From the original budget of $1,000,000 we are short 291,000. I recommend the money <br /> co a from the follow ng accounts: <br /> $150,000 fro WW SDC 334 4256 WW community WW ext. Leaves $129k in the budget (will need to look as <br /> vue het closer to biddi g how to fulley fund the estimated $300,000 project. <br /> $ 10,000 fro WW utility 532 job 3820 wwfm, leaves $6673 <br /> $ 40,000 fro WW utility 532 job 3961 cap planning, leaves $4,192 <br /> Thisl gives a $9,000 b ffer. <br /> M~rl~ if you are okay ith this scenario will you reply all and let us know. <br /> I <br /> I will sign and forward the bid review stuff to Lynn with this revised budget. You will need to sign the budget on Monday so <br /> we c n keep the cont cts moving. <br /> I <br /> If t~~ contracts are ro tact for initials/signature before Wednesday I am fine with Teri initialing for me. <br /> mC <br /> I <br /> ~I <br /> i <br /> ~I <br /> ~I <br /> i <br /> <br />