From: KRUEGER Jeff [mailto:JKrueger@Icog.org] <br /> Sept: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:59 AM <br /> To: JOI~S Eric R <br /> Cc: Hayes, Richard H NWP <br /> Subject: RE: Metro waterways ad ' <br /> Eric. I think we found out last time the the City gets a somewhat better deal on placing ads than LCOG so that would be <br /> my choice. The City or newspaper can send the invoice to LCOG and we'll pay for it out of our orps contract. How does <br /> that sound? <br /> i <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: JONES Eric R [mailto:Eric.R.JONES@ci.eugene.or.us] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 9:11 AM <br /> To: KRUEGER Jeff; HAYES Rick (SMTP) <br /> Cc: MEDARY Sarah J; BLACK Ed; LAUDATI Niel <br /> Subject: FW: Metro waterways ad <br /> I <br /> Attached is the ad that Kim Mast prepared to publicize the metro waterways workshops. The ad run schedule is: <br /> • Eugene Weekly, Feb. 9, @$350 (for 1/6 page ad) <br /> • Springfield News, Feb. 10, @$86 (for 2 column by 5" ad) <br /> • Register-Guard, Feb. 12, @$300 (for 2 column by 5" ad) <br /> i <br /> How do you want to handle the ad insertions? Options: we (City of Eugene) can place the ads a d get reimbursed) b~ <br /> LCOG/Corps; or LCOG can place the ads and get reimbursed by the Corps. Eugene gets a fav rable rate from tlye , -G, <br /> but LCOG may get the same favorable rate. ~ <br /> i <br /> Please advise if edits are needed to the ad. Please confirm how to proceed with the ad placeme ts. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Eric) <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: MAST Kim M <br /> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:22 PM <br /> To: JONES Eric R <br /> Subject: Metro waterways ad <br /> «MetroWateiway ad.pdf» j <br /> Here is a proof of the layout for the RG & Springfield News. <br /> Kim Mast ' <br /> Graphic Designer <br /> City of Eugene <br /> 682-5548 <br /> i <br /> i <br /> <br /> 6/20/2006 <br /> <br />