New Search
Another classic example of a true reimbursement is where multiple agencies go together to co-sponsor a diversity training, bring in <br /> a big-name speaker, etc. One agency serves as the coordinator and incurrs all of the costs for the event but then later, the ether <br /> agencie~are bt42d their proportional share--and the repayment is credited back against the original exp nditure accounts ~h~t <br /> were hit with the expenses. PW Day is a closer-to-home example, where Eric has everything coded to 8 20 initially, but tf~e~h we <br /> "spread" the costs back to the other funds/divisions according to some logical methodology--which result in a reimburserr}er~t to <br /> Eric's program. <br /> .nally, we don't bring in "revenue" against expenditure accounts, because that would be a circumvent on of Oregon Loyal: <br /> Budget Law (i.e., hiding expenditures). A true reimbursement is one of the few exceptions to that gener I rule. I appreciate your <br /> diligence, Debbie, in wanting to get these transactions recorded correctly and making sure we're doing t e "right thing." <br /> -becky j <br /> ~ .r.._._..._ <br /> ~ , <br /> From: CLARK Debbie D <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:54 AM <br /> <br /> To: JONES Eric R; CARLSON Becky A <br /> Cc: PETERSON Tish A <br /> Subject: RE: Metro waterways ad ~ <br /> i <br /> Eric, ' <br /> I still have not seen the ad front Eugene Weekly, I have been waiting to bill LC'OG. <br /> Becky, <br /> tNhen I bill. LCOG what accau.nt shauld 1 use (535-5920-4xxxx)? <br /> ~Dei~ilic~ <br /> _ <br /> . <br /> From: JONES Eric R <br /> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 12:25 PM <br /> To: CLARK Debbie D <br /> Cc: PETERSON Tish A <br /> Subject: F11V: Metro waterways ad <br /> A heads up that we'll be incurring about $750 worth of advertising related to the metro waterways projec (grant project code <br /> 360610). Options: <br /> • Take the from 535-8920-61731, invoice to LCOG, and receipt the reimbursement from LCOG s closely as pos~it~le to <br /> this ACK; I, <br /> • Absorb the expense as part of our match on the federal If we choose the latter, I'd prefer to c arge the expense <br /> i <br /> somewhere other than 8920. <br /> s <br /> Thanks, <br /> Eric) <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Hayes, Richard H NWP [mailto:Richard.H.Hayes@nwp0l.usace.army.mil] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:40 AM 1 <br /> To: KRUEGER Jeff; JONES Eric R <br /> Subject: RE: Metro waterways ad <br /> ~'"'~ds good, Jeff. <br /> ahead and process this between the city and LCOG -whatever you guys think best... <br /> thx, Rick <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> 6/20/2006 <br /> <br />