New Search
HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> From: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 7:43 AM <br /> to: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Vic: BONHAM John J; RAMIREZ Joe F; SCHOENING Mark A <br /> Subject: RE: Judkins point north 4091,945034 <br /> FYI <br /> I have changed the budget summary to show funding of $200,000 Road Fund and $90,510 Transportation SDC- <br /> ffnprovementcomponent <br /> 1`honks, <br /> Pieggy Hamlin <br /> Financial Anolyst <br /> Public Works Administration <br /> 6$2 5834 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: SCHOENING Mark A <br /> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 9:28 AM <br /> To: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Cc: BONHAM John J; RAMIREZ Jce F; HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: RE: Judkins point north 4091, 945034 <br /> I initialed the revised budget this morning. Peggy, please take the $40,000 out of services for new development <br /> for FY06. <br /> Mark <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 6:05 PM <br /> To: SCHOENING Mark A <br /> Cc: BONHAM John RAMIREZ Joe F; HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: Judkins point north 4091, 945034 <br /> I hope we can find $40,000 more for Judkins point north. We thought we were on track to be within <br /> budget when we bid it but many things were a bit over our estimated unit prices. <br /> I have forwarded the revised budget and recommend we move forward with this project but the revised <br /> budget is $290,000. Our current budget is $250,000. We have the Lane County money for $200,000 and <br /> our SDC reimburseable match for $50,000. Our expenses to date are in the order of $67,000. <br /> I know we are short on SDC for transportation project. We could lessen our contingency (current 10°t° for <br /> $17,637 and estimated costs to complete $25,000) but we will still fall short. I don't know of design <br /> elements we could not complete but if needed we can talk about that. <br /> What would be your preference? <br /> me <br /> <br /> ~r+ <br /> <br />