New Search
<br /> Message Page 3 of 6 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 3:11 PM <br /> To: GALLUP Steve S <br /> Cc: CAHILL Michelle R; KLOPE Paul W <br /> Subject: FW: GJN 4193 FSB Repairs <br /> Importance: High <br /> Hi Steve, <br /> Mark indicated that you would be the right person to respond to Jeff's question. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Peggy Hamlin <br /> Financial Analyst <br /> Public Works Administration <br /> 682 5834 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: PERRY Jeff J <br /> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:25 PM <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Cc: RAPP Cathy; WILLER Jenifer M; PETERSON Tish A; GALLUP Steve S; CAHILL Michelle R; SCHOENING <br /> Mark A; KLOPE Paul W; HARDT DeeAnn; CARIAGA Mia <br /> Subject: RE: GJN 4193 FSB Repairs <br /> Hi Peggy, as you are aware City Administrative Rules have established a 25% threshold for change <br /> orders on public contracts. This project obviously has exceeded that percentage by a pretty good margin <br /> and we were not informed about it until after it occurred. I realize this doesn't come up very often but it <br /> would be much more helpful and productive if Engineering contacted Mia or me before formally agreeing <br /> to increase a contract beyond the 25%. <br /> The good news is that with our new regulations I do have the discretion to approve contract change <br /> orders over 25%. If the continuation of this work with the existing contractor is in the best interest of the <br /> City I might be ok with it. I would appreciate it if you could provide some additional information as to why <br /> it would benefit us. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Jeff <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> 7/8/2005 <br /> <br />