New Search
<br /> 02?17/20t".~ 10:46 FAX X41 682 6030 CITY EUGENE P1M ENG ~ 0031003 <br /> • 1 <br /> From: HEIL Richard J <br /> Sant: Monday, April 25, 2005 10:00 AM <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Cc: BROGDEN Lynn; HIGGINS Teri L; CAHILL Michelle R; SCI~OENING Mark A <br /> Subject: RE: 4254 4-22-05 Revised Protect Estm. Post Bid .xis <br /> A math error is present in the below fund transfers. The 3 fund adjustor{~nts of $150K, $10K 3 <br /> $40 yield only $200K vs. the desired $300K. 1've spoken with both MC .end Mark and they are in <br /> agreement with a 4'"fund adjustment; i.e, moving $100K from WW SDG 334 4260 WW Rehab <br /> 2005 BSBN. leaving $40,344 in the budget (we will need to look at thi: as we get closer to <br /> bidding & how to fully fund the estimated $400,000 project). This actior follows the intent to <br /> carry us to the end of FY 05. I'm thinking FY06 funds will be necessary ;o fund remaining work <br /> for the construction projects later this summer. <br /> The revised budget which me prepared on Friday still holds. Please execute this budget to <br /> continue moving forward with contract award. <br /> --Rich <br /> 4254 4-ZZ-05 <br /> Revtsed Pr+ojeCt E... <br /> -----Orig(nal Message---- <br /> Frotti1: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Sent" Friday, April 22, 2005 6:36 PM <br /> To: HQL Richard J <br /> Cc: SCNOENING Mark A; HAMIIN Peggy D; BROGDEN Lynn; HISaGINS Teri L; CAFIILL <br /> Mkhelle R <br /> Subject: x254 4-ZZ-05 Revised Project Egtrn. Post 131d .xis <br /> «File: 4254 4-22-OS Revised Project Estm. Post Bid .x1s » <br /> Rich - <br /> Mark and I discussed what approach to take for the W1N Rehabs 4254 project with the <br /> higher than expected bid and the funding situation with WW funds. Mark thought we <br /> should account for the wntract and any PSF through June 30 in the current budget <br /> estimate and then do a revised budget for the full antk:lpated expenses in the new FY. <br /> So I have revised your estimate (since your at the DOCS and I am out Monday and <br /> Tuesday). I put in Just $15,000 for PSF. My thought was I didn't need tp be too precise <br /> since we won't have much contractor payments before June 30d-. The new estimate <br /> $1,290,570. From the original budget of $1,000,000 we are sho t 291,000. I <br /> recomorand the money come from the following arxounts: <br /> $150,000 from WW SDC 334 4256 WW community WV~' ext. Leaves $129k in <br /> the budget (will need to look as we get closer to bidding how to f<illey fund the estimated <br /> $300,000 project. <br /> $10,000 from WW utility 532 Job 3820 wwfm, leaves $6ii73 <br /> <br />