New Search
02/17/2006 10:46 FA}4 X41 682 6030 CITY EUGENE Pw ENG ~ 0.302/003 <br /> Y <br /> <br /> ~ - , - <br /> CAHILL Michelle R <br /> From: CAHILL Michelle R • <br /> Sant: Friday, April 22, 2005 6:36 PM <br /> To: NEIL Richard J <br /> Cc: $CHOENING Mark A; HAMLIN Peggy D; BROGDEN Lynn; HI(3GINS Teri L; CAHILL Michelle <br /> R <br /> Subject: 4254 4-22-05 Revised Project F~tm. Post Bid .xis <br /> 4254 422-05 <br /> tZEV19od E.. <br /> Rich - <br /> Markand (discussed what approach to take for the WW Rehabe 4254 project with the higher than expected bid and the <br /> funding situation with WW funds. Mark thought we should account for the contract and any P8F through June 30 in the <br /> current budget estimate and then do a revised budget for the full anticipated expens~:s in the new FY. <br /> So I have revised your estimate (entice your at the DOCs and I am out Monday and Tuesday). I put in just 515,000 for <br /> P8F. My thought was l didn't need to be too precise since we won't have much cont~~actor payments before June 30th. <br /> The new estimate 51,290,570. From the original budget of 61,000,000 we are short 291,000. t recommend the money <br /> come from the foMoHAng accounts: <br /> 5150,000 from WW SDC 334 4256 WW community WW ext. Leaves 5129k in the budget (will need to bok as <br /> ws get cbser to bidding how to fulley fund the estimated 6300,000 project. <br /> 610,000 from W W utitily 532 job 3820 wwfm, leaves 56873 <br /> S 40,000 from VW1l utAity 532 job 3981 cap planning, leaves 64,192 <br /> This gives a ;9,000 buffer. <br /> Marts if you are okay with this scenarb will you ropy all and let us know. <br /> I will sign and forward the bid review stuff to Lynn with this revised budget. You will need to sign lt~e budget on Monday so <br /> we can keep the contracts moving. <br /> If the contracts are routed for initials/slgnature before Wednesday I am fine with Teri Initialing for me. <br /> me <br /> 1 <br /> <br />