New Search
~ 't <br /> C~.ARK Debbie D <br /> Fr m: SMITH Tammy D <br /> Suitt Monday, January 29, 2007 9:07 AM <br /> ToI: RODRIGUES Matt J; CLARK Debbie D <br /> C LARSEN Tom C; RISDAL Lacey L; SCHOENING Mark A; KLOPE Paul W <br /> Subject: RE: Reimbursement costs for new conduit installation on Polk St. and Arthur St. <br /> i <br /> j' <br /> M tt, <br /> It I~oks like Tom wants to use Traffic Signal Improvements -Upgrades (975024) Fund 333 - SDC Transportation. Please <br /> su~rrjit a fiinal budget with the use of these funds and PWA will create a journal to move the budget and actual expenses. <br /> Ta~ntny Smith, x5834 <br /> I <br /> Fro RISDAL Lacey L <br /> Se t: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:43 AM <br /> Toil SMITH Tammy D <br /> Cc: ~ LARSEN Tom C <br /> Sugje~t: FW: Reimbursement costs for new conduit installation on Polk St. and Arthur St. <br /> Ta II ~y, <br /> Ca you work with Matt to pay the bill that he describes below from the funding source that Tom describes. I haven't <br /> wo ked with the Traffic signal enhancement funding much, so let me know if there are any issues with using it on this <br /> pr eCt. Thanks for your help, <br /> La ey <br /> Fro LARSEN Tom C <br /> Se Monday, January 29, 2007 8:38 AM <br /> To: j RISDAL Lacey L <br /> Sub~edt: FW: Reimbursement costs for new conduit installation on Polk St. and Arthur St. <br /> There is something like $150,000 annually for "Traffic Signal Enhancement" in the CIP funded from Transportation SDCs. <br /> I understood it was our intention to use these funds for the conduit to facilitate future signal improvements. How do we <br /> ma e'that happen? <br /> ~i <br /> Fro RODRIGUES Matt J <br /> Sen : Wednesday, January 17, 2007 4:08 PM <br /> To:~ DALE Randal) <br /> Cc: ~ LARSEN Tom C <br /> Sub eCt: Reimbursement costs for new conduit installation on Polk St. and Arthur St. <br /> Rar~di~l, <br /> I ar~ in the middle of closing out last summers projects and I need to get funding for the conduit installation on Polk St. and <br /> Art ur St. For Polk St., since we ran into depth issues with the open trench the contractor attempted on Polk St. there were <br /> so e;extra costs associated with the work, however I feel that sorting that out was our responsibility so I propose that <br /> Tra in Ops pay for the bill to bore the conduit which was paid by change order. The cost was $3,213 and is not out of line <br /> wit tfe original estimate we had to perform this work. I'm still working out the costs for Arthur St. and will get back to you <br /> sho lyr. <br /> Thank you, <br /> <br /> Math Roc~riguea <br /> Civil Engineer II <br /> City',o{ Iru~ene - I;n~ineerin~ <br /> °H: 541-682-6036 <br /> -'X:541-682-8410 <br /> 1 <br /> <br />