New Search
SMITH Tamm D <br /> From: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:01 PM <br /> o; SMITH Tammy D <br /> Cc: PETERSON Tish A; SCHOENING Mark A; KLOPE Paul W; CLARK Debbie D <br /> Subject: RE: Fund 333 <br /> Attachments: final budget judkins n jn4091.pdf <br /> Tammy - <br /> Thanks for clarifying the Judkins Point stuff. <br /> You are right, the full $200k in 312 should be expended, so transferring expenditures to that would be appropriate. Then <br /> use all of 333. Then, for the 30k or so we are short I'm thinking none of the options you I.D.'d are gonna work and I'm <br /> pretty sure this project didn't make it into S63. So, the latest project we are "borrowing" from is the Delta Ponds Bike Path <br /> (965132) so that's the place to take the $30k from. I hope the revised budget attached will work for the final budget <br /> closeout. <br /> ~6~ <br /> final budget judkins <br /> n jn4091.... <br /> As far as a warranty expense for Project 955574 (GJN4291): Game Farm Rd Street Lights : since this was built by LC and <br /> they don't have warranty periods in their contract there won't be warranty work. <br /> Thanks for working on all this Tammy. <br /> me <br /> From: SMITH Tammy D <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:54 AM <br /> To: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> r~;,c; PETERSON Tish A; SCHOENING Mark A; KLOPE Paul W; CLARK Debbie D <br /> Subject: RE: Fund 333 <br /> Michelle, <br /> Project 945034 Judkins Point North (GJN 4091): Please send a copy of the Final Project Budget Summary for Judkins <br /> Point North to PWA. In reviewing the paperwork it looks like Val & Debbie C had questions back in January on the Revised <br /> Project Budget Summary in part due to Lane County funding of Judkins Point North and South and whether they were 1 or <br /> 2 projects, which we now know is two projects. <br /> Notes from Revised Project Budget Summary dated Dec 05 ~ Jan 06 I various e-mails/ April 5th meeting <br /> 1 -Fund 312 increase budget by $56,300, but from which project? In the April 5th meeting there is a note that the <br /> expenditures were to be moved to Fund 333 current amount $55,533.20. I can have Debbie move the actual expenses this <br /> week. Fund 312 for this project would then have a budget & expenses of $200,000 and we would not increase the funding <br /> by $56,300. <br /> 2 -Fund 333 has available budget of $27,286.31 before moving expenses from 312. After we move the expenses the <br /> project will then need about $28,250 plus warranty to close out the project which would be about $30,000 you requested. <br /> Which projects are going to fund GJN 4091 or is this amount in the SB3 request total? We can send the paperwork to <br /> close the project after the funding issues are resolved. <br /> Generic Projects (Mother) Available <br /> Services for New Development 16,075 <br /> Street & Alley Preservation 629,316 (Which may not be available for this project due to council <br /> restrictions) <br /> Traffic Operations Imp Prog 29,577 (What are the restrictions on these funds if any) <br /> Traffic Signal Impvmnt - Upgrds 52,400 (What are the restrictions on these funds if any) <br /> Project 955064 - WUN (GJN 4172): I have requested that Debbie move the Land Use Hearing expenses from this project <br /> (Fund 312) per a-mail from Mark last week. Debbie C. will send the paperwork necessary to close out this project so no <br /> new expenses will post. Funds 118 & 351 look over budget because the receivables do not post to the project level <br /> ,,,.according to Debbie W in Financial Reporting. Funding should be accurate for Fund 333. <br /> Project 955574 (GJN4291): Game Farm Rd Street Lights -will there be warranty fee for this project? <br /> <br /> f 1 <br /> °h <br /> <br />