New Search
time to a sanitary sewer project next year and get us a really <br /> good bid?7? ?? This option assures us that all monies <br /> budgeted for FY-94 is encumbered and unless bids came in <br /> significantly less than expected we wouldn't be hounding <br /> Carolyn and Valerie to carry the funds forward again, as it <br /> seems we do every year. <br /> 2. This option retains storm sewer funding for storm sewer • <br /> projects and takes the Ritter$140,000 for FY-94, the $62,400 <br /> for FY-95 and $60,000 of the approximate $70,000 CIP Storm <br /> Rehab Funding for FY-94,which is still available. This <br /> option continues to separate sanitary and storm sewer funding <br /> but places the burden on engineering to assure us they will be <br /> able to expend or encumber the $172,000 in John Gibson's <br /> budget for sanitary sewer related projects before July, 1994. <br /> Both options assumes no contractural amazon channel projects <br /> in FY-95 but if an emergency occur's we have to make the <br /> decision of sanitary or storm. I prefer option#1 and believe <br /> Doug Weber prefers option#1, but would like to hear from some <br /> of the rest of you. I did tell Doug I would get back to him <br /> on Friday but believe Bob Hammitt is gone on Friday so it will <br /> probably be Monday, Doug. <br /> • <br /> Page 2 <br />