New Search
• <br /> City of Eugene BMP list and how it applies outside City Limits with Option 3 <br /> 11-22-02 <br /> Eugene comments/additions in Bold Underlined 12/5/02 <br /> BMP BMP Description Who Does What/Any Change Financial Impact <br /> A 1 BMPs for Eugene would implement. No change to current No impact. Any additional <br /> X businesses plan. Possible increase in educational 014.. costs picked up by County? <br /> outreach,educational materials? 6.- <br /> x A2 Stormwater Eugene would implement. Possible increase in Any additional costs picked <br /> Education mailings and SPLASH program, hand-outs, &k._ up by County. <br /> printed materials,special events. <br /> B1 Household Hoz Eugene would implement. County is currently � No additional impact. County <br /> a Waste Program partnering with City in this area. No additional currently contributes to this <br /> ,� changes. BMP. ,o v A‘--1 :s ��r r e - le..•( <br /> `�!f%' <br /> B2 Solid Waste Eugene would implement. No change to current No impact. <br /> 4g, Management plan. 0\C-- <br /> El Develop Comp Eugene would implement. Minifna4 Some impact. <br /> X Basin Plans •_ : : • ' '' • ' :.: :. - . ' •' :. -:: County to compensate for any <br /> ���, covered. Finalize draft RR-SC plan. Expand additional cost. <br /> G dans for other draina le basins to the UGA. <br /> 'E2 Erosion Eugene would implement. Increase to area Minimal impact. County to <br /> X - Prevention and covered. Printed materials, (If city staff does compensate for any additional <br /> Const Site Mngt enforcement,cost to expand area). City and cost. Administration <br /> UT Code changes required. inspection and enforcement <br /> �, `tG, �� '� related to activities <br /> CC'"` �\.- requiring an erosion permit <br /> G j•Pr. �4"l, ,r but not necessitating <br /> �l� 4 ,,\---1 ��� annexation would be an <br /> y� �o`' , x". additional expense to City, <br /> and covered by County. <br /> Cut E3 System Mapping County would update information. ` County covered cost. <br /> E4 Stream Corridor Eugene would implement. Additional land No additional impact. $from <br /> Acquisition , available to consider. Partnership with County County? ��/ <br /> outside City limits? Delete outside City limits? / 'cL 'yo-'`` <br /> 0— q, y <br /> Currently acquisition program funds are only ,j O <br /> expended within UGB with minor exceptions. <br /> i thscip, . 6 r ,_;,• <br /> )s To fund acquisition outside of UGB would r r'`` °` <br /> \)') \ require additional funds from the County. This `0K�a <br /> may be very desirable for key waterways such h _ <br /> as East Santa Clara Waterway,and Spring (5 ' <br /> Creek but is the Count willin' able to fund? • <br /> E5 WQ Drainage and Eugene would implement. No change to current No i pact. Seems like <br /> Design Stds for plan. Current plan for adoption is unclear, and additional costs here? <br /> X New is pending outcome of storm fund discussions Administration, inspection <br /> Development and priorities. The fact that this is a BMP in and enforcement related to <br /> Eugene's permit and is one of the six minimum activities requiring water <br /> measures required for Phase II communities quality BMPs but not <br /> needs to be factored into the decision "when to necessitating annexation <br /> adopt". would be an additional <br /> ex sense to Cit . Most <br />