New Search
Date: 05/27/92 CEWMJRM - RIS1 <br /> From: Johnny Medlin CEWMJRH - RIS1 <br /> To: Bob Hammitt <br /> Subject: Tugman <br /> Reference: Note from John Etter (CERMJFE - RIS1) attached below <br /> Bob, I thought you might be interested in a reply John sent to me after I <br /> asked him how he came up with the 30,000 c.y. Tugman cover figure. The <br /> 30,000 is correct and the attached shows a rough breakdown of what yardage <br /> he thinks might need to go where. I do believe we need to budget at least <br /> a place holder item in the FY-94 CIP in 011 for this project. <br /> Johnny <br /> ATTACHED NOTE <br /> Date: 05/27/92 CERMJFE - RIS1 <br /> From: John Etter CEWMJRM - RIS1 <br /> To: Johnny Medlin <br /> Subject: Tugman <br /> Based on what I've picked up so far, a substantial covering effort will come <br /> out of the next recommendation/requirement. The cap over 4 acres is almost <br /> non-existent in places. I'm guessing they will recommend building it to 2 <br /> feet. 2 feet over 4 acres is about 13000 yards. The bank area could ideally <br /> use an average of about 6 feet over one acre, or almost 10000 yards; deeper <br /> there to provide contouring that would allow better maintenance. In suggesting <br /> another 7000 yards, I envisioned providing some contouring that would help <br /> create an area suitable for snow play when those conditions permit. <br /> I am also assuming that the heavy Amazon soils will be looked on favorable as <br /> capping material by the consultants. If we have to go farther for cover <br /> material , then the price will really go up. <br /> The Amazon Channel improvement, as envisioned by Jeff Kruger, would probably <br /> only get funded to the extent that the recommendations that would be a part <br /> of the storm water quality study solution. Not likely that it would suggest <br /> a lot of change, if any, to the upper Amazon. So it will only progress to the <br /> extent that Tugman funding demands a certain solution. <br /> Chuck Solin is working on an RFP with the city attorney, and it should be going <br /> out soon. My suggestion for the CIP would be to show an SWAGed amount of <br /> funding in FY 94, which we might revise in the late fall , when I think the next <br /> study might identify the exact solutions, for which better estimates can be <br /> made. <br />