New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Urban Forestry, General
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
Urban Forestry, General
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2014 11:24:41 AM
Creation date
12/10/2014 11:24:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> December 12, 1996 <br /> TO: Service Improvement Steering Committee <br /> FROM: Service Improvement Team <br /> SUBJECT: Proposal for "queue" of remaining service profiles <br /> Background <br /> When the Budget Committee adopts the service profiles presented to it in January and <br /> February, the FY98 Proposed Budget will contain 21 services in the new format. We <br /> will have completed 44% of the existing 48 services. <br /> Warren has requested we re- evaluate the service profile effort in light of BM47. He has <br /> asked us to complete the service profiles so that information presented in the service <br /> view of the budget can be consistent across categories. This memo describes our <br /> thinking on how to "queue" the remaining services. <br /> Queuing Criteria <br /> (For purposes of this analysis, we used the information included in the 9/30/96 document entitled "Ballot <br /> Measure 47 Reduction Examples ". We will adjust the actual order of profiles depending on the service <br /> reduction strategy adopted.) <br /> • Highest priority is given to those services that are either non - General Fund or for <br /> whom the impact of BM47 is less than or equal to 10 %. <br /> • The larger the service reduction, the lower the priority. This approach gives <br /> teams time to decide the impact of reductions before completing a profile. <br /> • Any service slated to be dropped within a year would no longer be in our queue. <br /> • Because they have no external customers, we recommend putting the <br /> administration services at the end of the queue. We also put Social Services, <br /> which is solely contractual money, in the fourth priority. <br /> • For planning purposes, we indicated if the service was "small ", "medium ", or <br /> "large ". Without modifying the existing process or product, service teams of <br /> "small" services can complete a profile in approximately 24 hours of team time. <br /> A "large" profile now takes between 45 and 50 hours of team time. <br /> SISC Direction Requested <br /> At the December 16 meeting: - c) N`ro <br /> • Agree or adjust SIT emphasis on completing service pro , <br /> • Modify, if desired, and adopt the Service Profile queue c <br /> Shortly thereafter: <br /> • Identify service leads and select staff teams for profiles <br /> starting with those with asterisks ( *'s). <br /> • Planning & Development: Select next project. <br /> By Mid - January: <br /> • PDD & PW: Provide SIT with specific direction on queue for remaining Priority <br /> One services (other departments are self - evident). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.