New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Tree Team
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
Tree Team
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2014 2:50:46 PM
Creation date
10/17/2014 2:50:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Medlin folder
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
or reconstruction projects, new trees will be planted as space allows. Except for <br /> Road Fund projects, according to the revised Tree Preservation Ordinance, <br /> replacement value will be charged to the project. <br /> 7) In the future, project managers should include the standard tree planting amount in <br /> the project budget estimate, and add extra for tree evaluation and root <br /> investigation during the design process, and for importing soil for planting during <br /> construction. (If the revised Tree Ordinance is adopted, compensation for loss of <br /> trees will be charged to any fund except the Road Fund and will need to be part of <br /> the project budget.) <br /> 8) The Downtown area is different from other areas, with no setbacks and compacted <br /> development. This area will require special specifications. <br /> 9) Since many variables exist when evaluating each project for tree issues, it <br /> becomes very difficult to pinpoint universal limits to apply to all projects. For <br /> instance, the ROW location determines whether certain trees may be preserved, <br /> but so does the type of tree, its health, its location, the value of the tree, and the <br /> level of public concern. The best approach may be to go through the process <br /> depicted in the "ideal" flow chart, using the "guiding principles" and taking into <br /> consideration the "guidelines for evaluating design alternatives" that the group has <br /> outlined. <br /> Design considerations were identified as follows: <br /> • Functionality of design <br /> • Political sensitivity <br /> • Both structural soundness and tree preservation (tree health & <br /> survivability, legal and planning goals, safety & location) <br /> • Cost <br /> 10) If, after evaluation and negotiation, there is no agreement about a creative <br /> solution, or because of political sensitivity, a request- for - decision will be bumped <br /> up to the next supervisory level. <br /> 11) For the PEPI Process: Urban Forestry staff now review PUDs and Site Reviews as <br /> part of the land use process. For the swath of private property close to the <br /> proposed ROW, the Urban Forestry review could include comments about which <br /> trees should be protected using the standard CRZ of 30 feet. Staff can request <br /> more information from the applicant about trees in the ROW, especially if trees <br /> may be Heritage trees. In the information items on the PUD or Site Review <br /> report, Urban Forestry should mention the PEPI process and the need to be <br /> consistent between the tree preservation plan and PEPI plans. <br /> 12) Planners, once the Tree Preservation Plan is complete, should send a copy of the <br /> plan to Team Central. It should be filed in the construction plan folder so it goes <br /> to the project inspector. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.