New Search
a) Review of residential property development or redevelopment on parcels <br /> greater than or equal to 20,000 s.f. which are not in a PUD and are <br /> requesting the removal of more than 5 trees. <br /> b) Review of commercial and industrial property development or <br /> redevelopment. <br /> 1. Demolition <br /> 2. Building modifications <br /> 3. Parking lot modification <br /> c) CUP <br /> d) SR <br /> e) Subdivision or minor partitions <br /> f) removal of any public tree (right -of -way or public property) <br /> The issue here is that personnel have not been specifically assigned to look for tree <br /> removal in the public right -of -way. In addition, information regarding the placement of <br /> street trees is not required when plans for building on the private parcel are submitted. <br /> SOLUTIONS: <br /> 1. PIC will require development plans to show location of all street trees and <br /> require any requested removals to be specifically noted. <br /> 2. Engineering or Transportation Loan Staff at the PIC will be assigned the <br /> responsibility to review and refer to Maintenance Division those plans which <br /> show requested removals or construction in the right -of -way within 10 feet of a <br /> street tree. <br /> g) Building Division's residential quick start program <br /> The issue here is that a quick start is not a formal permit and therefore does not <br /> qualify for the "having a residential permit" exemption in the administrative rules <br /> for tree ordinance. This is further complicated for those parcels over 20,000 s.f. <br /> requesting the removal of more than 10 trees due to the public notice provisions <br /> of the tree ordinance coming into effect. This notice period effectively negates <br /> the value of a "quick start". <br /> SOLUTIONS: <br /> 2 <br />