New Search
URBAN FORESTRY SERVICE PROFILE EVALUATION <br /> 1 Strongly Agree 2 Agree 3 Disagree 4 Strongly Disagree <br /> Questions Mean 1 2 3 4 <br /> The Service Profile succeeds in capturing: The 1.83 <br /> service description (narrative, historic perspective, • <br /> citizen /customer input) <br /> The strategic view (mission, outcomes, operating 2.00 <br /> principies, operating environment) <br /> Key change areas for the next two to three years 1.83 <br /> (strategies, objectives, and work plan activities) <br /> The process view (system map, core process and 2.00 <br /> system performance measures) <br /> The service team assembled was made up of the right 1.67 <br /> people to do this Service Profile. <br /> The process encouraged effective communication 1.50 <br /> among team members. <br /> The process helped our team identify the most 1.83 _ <br /> important issues for us to work on. <br /> Overall, I felt that developing the profile was a good 1.83 <br /> use of my time. <br /> The facilitators were well organized. 1.67 _ <br /> The facilitators engaged the group effectively. 1.50 - <br /> Instructions for respondents consisted of indicating how much they agreed or disagreed with the <br /> above statements. Of the six possible members of the Urban Forestry Service Team, six <br /> responded to the survey questionnaire sent in December, 1996. <br />