New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Vegetation (2)
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Miscellaneous
>
Vegetation (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2014 10:51:32 AM
Creation date
10/17/2014 10:47:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Medlin Veg Folder
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
number of such enforcement functions performed during the 1989 calendar year. <br />The resultant figures then give us the total time spent on each of the various <br />functions for the entire year (Table II). Since these function times have <br />been segregated into their respective management categories, the amount of <br />annual operations time spent in each management category is easily derived by <br />adding the annual function times within each category. Dividing this by the <br />total of all the function times, we get the percentages of total program <br />operations spent in each management category. By subtracting the total time <br />of all enforcement operation functions from the total annual time devoted to <br />the program, we get the amount of program time spent on administrative duties. <br />When this administration time is divided among the 3 management categories and <br />added to the enforcement operation function times of each, the total annual <br />time spent in each category along with their percentage of total program time <br />can be calculated (Table III). <br />Since the Vegetation Manager and the temporary summer aide have greatly <br />different pay and benefit rates, the next step of this analysis calculates the <br />varying percentages of each of these positions' time that was spent during <br />calendar year 1989 in the enforcement functions and administration of each <br />management category. With the documentation of position time per management <br />category, we now have all the information necessary for the actual assignment <br />of costs between the various management categories. <br />At this point the costs for typical abatements in each management category are <br />calculated based on documented time and material costs involved in the <br />activities required by such abatement (Tables IV,V, and VI). Following this, <br />the average operations cost per abatement for each management category is <br />calculated based on an itemization, by category, of the program's operating <br />expenses for calendar year 1989 (Table VII). Lastly, administrative costs for <br />personal services and training are added and the average total operations and <br />administration cost per abatement for each management category is calculated <br />based on an itemization of expenses as in the previous section (Table VIII). <br />A final table (Table IX) summarizes the costs calculated for each category by <br />the 3 different methodologies. This table is repeated below. <br />PROGRAM COST ADDED TO CONTRACTOR BILLING <br />INDIVIDUAL <br />OPERATIONS <br />PROGRAM <br />ABATEMENT <br />RECOVERY <br />RECOVERY <br />DEVELOPED PROPERTY 93.21 <br />833.18 <br />910.59 <br />UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY 74.50 <br />149.37 <br />159.86 <br />CITY OWNED PROPERTY 37.74 <br />40.40 <br />71.27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.