New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Vegetation (2)
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Miscellaneous
>
Vegetation (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2014 10:51:32 AM
Creation date
10/17/2014 10:47:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Medlin Veg Folder
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />Vegetation Management Program <br />Cost Analysis <br />February 20, 1990 <br />by <br />Jack Long <br />Maintenance Planning Section <br />The primary aim of this analysis is to separate and document the costs <br />associated with the Vegetation Management Program's various management <br />categories and to calculate an average City incurred cost for each of the <br />various types of vegetation abatements enforced through this program. These <br />per abatement costs can then serve as a basis for restructuring the vegeta- <br />tion program's owner billing schedules, which has been called for by an <br />independent hearings official hired by the City. These property owner billing <br />schedules may be structured to recover varying percentages of the costs <br />incurred by the City, depending upon management philosophy. As such, program <br />costs have been documented according to 3 alternative methodologies that vary <br />in the extent of cost recovery embraced. <br />The first methodology will study the actual time and material costs spent on a <br />typical vegetation abatement, carried to term, for each of the program's 3 <br />management categories. These management categories are: vegetation nuisances <br />on privately owned developed property; vegetation nuisances on privately owned <br />undeveloped property; and vegetation nuisances on City owned property, <br />primarily but not exclusively undeveloped. <br />The second methodology will calculate a per abatement cost for each of the <br />management categories by studying the total daily operations costs, not <br />including administrative costs, associated with the management of this program <br />for the 1989 calendar year. <br />The third methodology will calculate a per abatement cost for each of the <br />management categories by studying all the costs, whether they are operating <br />expenses or administrative costs, that are associated with the management of <br />this program for the 1989 calendar year. <br />The first step in this analysis calculates the average percentage of annual <br />time the Vegetation Manager devotes to the operation and administration of.the <br />Vegetation Management Program. To this is added the time spent by the <br />temporary summer aide. The resultant figure is total annual personal services <br />time spent on this program. <br />The next step breaks this total personal services time down between the 3 <br />different management categories. This is accomplished by the use of an <br />activity time matrix (Table I) that documents the average times involved in <br />the performance of minor activities that, when taken together, make up the <br />major enforcement operation functions of the program. The calculated totals <br />of these activities, herein called function times, are then multiplied by the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.