M E M O R A N D U M <br />TO: Terry Grondona <br />FROM: James W. Spickerm <br />DATE: August 16, 1989 (7 <br />RE: Vegetation Nuisance Abatement <br />There are two matters I want to mention since this is our first <br />time through on the weed abatement assessment process. <br />First, as near as I can tell, the document entitled : <br />VEGETATION MANAGEMENT DEVELOPED PROPERTY BILLING <br />INVOICE NO. 89 -62 <br />and indicating a billing date of July 14, 1989 here served as the <br />notice required by Section 6.100(1). <br />Section 6.100(1) provides as follows: <br />"The finance officer, by registered or certified mail, <br />postage prepaid, shall forward to a person responsible <br />a notice stating: <br />(a) The total cost of abatement including the <br />administrative overhead. <br />(b) That the cost as indicated will be assessed to <br />and become a lien against the property unless paid within <br />ten (10) days from the date of the notice. <br />(c) That if the person responsible objects to the <br />cost of the abatement as indicated, he may file a written <br />notice of objection with the finance officer not more <br />than ten (10) days from the date of the notice. <br />To avoid any possible challenge to the procedure in the future, I <br />would suggest that the requirements of that section pertaining to <br />the contents of the notice be strictly followed. The notice should <br />specifically state that the "cost as indicated will be assessed to <br />and become a lien against the property unless paid within ten (10) <br />days of the notice." Furthermore, subsection (c) should be <br />specifically addressed by more closely incorporating the language <br />of that section. It should indicate that the written notice of <br />objection be filed with the finance officer not more than ten (10) <br />days from the date of the notice. <br />The second issue, of course, is that of establishing a "reasonable <br />charge for administrative overhead" in these situations." Perhaps <br />