e <br />MEMORANDUM <br />February 23, 1988 <br />TO: Bob Hammitt <br />FROM: J. R. Medlin 41� <br />SUBJECT: VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RATES CHARGED TO PROPERTY OWNERS <br />Since the Vegetation MAnagement Program was transferred into Maintenance <br />Planning last month I have been researching through old documents for infor- <br />mation to establish the programs past practices. Understanding these past <br />practices are mandatory to establish a beginning point for the Vegetation <br />Management Policies and Procedures document now being written. <br />Attached is a 1985 report from Mona Mellott of the Finance Dept. which outlines <br />the recommendation for the hourly charge to the property owner to be $75 per <br />hour. Also attached is a memo from Warren Wong to Chris Andersen seconding <br />this recommendation and referencing Dave Whitlow's support. <br />To date, I have been unable to find any documents from Chris on this matter. <br />While I am sure they must exist since the $75 charge was implemented, instead <br />of performing further research on the matter I believe time can be spent in a <br />little more fruitfull manner by taking a different approach. <br />Last year the charges to the property owner was $75 for the first hour and $40 <br />for each additional hour thereafter with a $75 minimum billing. Jim tells me <br />that the reduction to $40 for additional hours worked is not in writing nor was <br />it published for the general public. The reason for this reduction was that <br />our overhead is mostly covered in the charges for the first hour and leaving <br />the cost at $75 thereafter was hard to justify other than to provide financing <br />for the overall program. <br />An example of this would be the property taking one hour to mow compared to the <br />property taking ten hours. <br />1. The mowing contractor would charge us $25 and $250 respectively for these <br />cuts. <br />2. Using $75 per hour for all hours would be $75 and $750 respectively. <br />3. Using last years procedure this would be $75 and $435 respectively. <br />Past staff did not feel $500 for overhead was justified on a 10 hour project <br />whereas the overhead amount of $185 was within reason. I think I agree with <br />this thinking, especially since Finance Dept. is now placing liens on pro- <br />perties for unpaid bills which in effect will eventually eliminate the need to <br />otherwise support most of the uncollectables. <br />