s pate ecttiKS <br /> LANKSTON Jeff <br /> From: ANDERSEN Chris F <br /> To: LANKSTON Jeff; GRUBE Renee L; SMITH Terry M <br /> Cc: PHELPS Linda M <br /> Subject: RE: Facility Scheduling <br /> Date: Monday, March 01, 1999 11:OOAM <br /> Currently, Jeff is lead on coordination with 4 -J and has been attending their staff meetings regarding football plans. <br /> George Russell, Bill Hirsh and David Piercy have been going the rounds to gain support for the 4 field approach <br /> with the expectation that the city will be a player in that scenario. David will be calling me in the near future to <br /> schedule a meeting of our two staffs (city and 4 -J) to discuss the public involvement process necessary for the city <br /> to be involved in the projects. I believe many of the issues related to scheduling of fields and availability will be <br /> worked out in that public process. There are concerns about how late the facilities may be used in the evenings, <br /> traffic associated with types of activities, etc., so we know those will be issues. The funds we will be working from <br /> are those associated with the youth sports complex in the bond. The opportunity to have artificial turf may mean <br /> fewer fields but longer playing season and other possible trade -offs. All will need to be discussed in the public <br /> involvement process. <br /> I am assuming that Renee will continue to be our primary staff contact with LRCS on athletic field issues. So far <br /> that seems to be working well from PW vantage point - -I personally appreciate your help, Renee, in working <br /> through the field renovation and Bond Complex issues over the last few weeks! I would expect Renee to be part <br /> of the staff group meeting with 4 -J to develop the public involvement process. If there are any problems with this <br /> approach as I've described it above please let me know. Thanks, Chris <br /> From: GRUBE Renee L <br /> To: SMITH Terry M <br /> Cc: PHELPS Linda M; ANDERSEN Chris F <br /> Subject: RE: Facility Scheduling <br /> Date: Monday, March 01, 1999 9:53AM <br /> Terry, once we know what the general plan is, I will definitely be able to get you this information. Thanks. Renee <br /> From: SMITH Terry M <br /> To: GRUBE Renee L <br /> Cc: PHELPS Linda M; ANDERSEN Chris F <br /> Subject: RE: Facility Scheduling <br /> Date: Sunday, February 28, 1999 4:25PM <br /> I've talked w/ Jim & Chris about this. It is clear that my question is too early. It is also clear that everyone has <br /> very good intentions about multiple use of any new artificial turf fields built w/ a mix of POS & 4J bonds. What I 'm <br /> trying to do is make sure those good intentions can actually be realized. Seems like the best way to test that is by <br /> looking at a hypothetical schedule for the use of the new fields. Until 4j has made the 1 vs 4 fields decision, that <br /> can't be done. Once that decision has been made, Renee I'm hopeful that you can get the info that would allow us <br /> to be assured other users will have access at usable times to these new fields. Does that seem possible to you? <br /> After all of our experience of the practical difficulties of actually scheduling the use of facilities, I don't want us to <br /> make that mistake again. The most recent example w/ the Fair Grounds was such a disaster! <br /> From: PHELPS Linda M <br /> To: SMITH Terry M <br /> Subject: FW: Facility Scheduling <br /> Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 3:50PM <br /> I know she gave this a lot of consideration -- Is there anything else you would like her /us to try to put together at <br /> this point or are you okay with letting it ride a bit while the politics sort themselves out? Linda <br /> From: GRUBE Renee L <br /> To: SMITH Terry M <br /> Cc: PHELPS Linda M <br /> Subject: Facility Scheduling <br /> Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 3:34PM <br /> Page 1 <br />