New Search
Message Page 2 of 3 <br /> Thanks Johnny <br /> We agree that de minimis is the right way to go. We have been working on the documentation <br /> necessary for a de minimis finding and hope to have a draft to you early next week. <br /> Jim <br /> James B. Cox Jr. <br /> Advanced Contracting Unit Manager <br /> ODOT Major Projects Branch <br /> 680 Cottage St NE <br /> Salem, OR 97301 <br /> office (503) 986 -6612 <br /> cell (503) 930 -7620 <br /> fax (503) 986 -4469 <br /> Original Message <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R [mailto:Johnny.R.MEDLIN @ci.eugene.or.us] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 4:35 PM <br /> To: COX Jim B <br /> Cc: TAYLOR Trevor H; WOLD Eric N; COREY Kurt A <br /> Subject: RE: WRB - Section 4(f); I -5 bridge project <br /> Hi Jim, <br /> After reviewing the documentation you sent regarding Section 4(f), we feel ODOT's temporary occupancy <br /> of Alton Baker Park would best fit within the "de minimis use" under Section 4(f). If you need any additional <br /> information from City of Eugene on this issue, please let Trevor and me know. <br /> Please let us know if you have any questions. <br /> Thanks <br /> Johnny <br /> Johnny Medlin, Director <br /> Parks and Open Space Division of Public Works <br /> 1820 Roosevelt Blvd. <br /> Eugene, Oregon 97402 <br /> (541)682 -4800 <br /> From: COX Jim B [mailto:Jim.B.COX @odot.state.or.us] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 8:53 AM <br /> To: TAYLOR Trevor H <br /> Subject: WRB - Section 4(f) <br /> Trevor <br /> Here is some information on Section 4(f). <br /> We have been taking the approach that our temporary occupancy would not constitute a <br /> "use" under Section 4(f) and therefore Section 4(0 does not apply. The attached Section <br /> 11/12/2008 <br />